ArticleActa medica Philippina2024
A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study on the Ophthalmic Symptoms and Signs in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Southeast Asia: Current Landscape and Future Priorities.British journal of biomedical science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study described the ophthalmic symptoms and signs in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPCA). Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study involving patients with histologically-confirmed NPCA seen in two subspecialty eye clinics in a single referral hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. Chart review obtained data on symptoms and ophthalmic findings of patients with NPCA on the first visit. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. Results: There were 36 patients in the study. There were 27 males (75%) and mean age was 47 years (Range: 13 - 83). Delay to consult was marked, with 28 patients (78%) presenting later than three months; 19 (53%) had invasion to distant sites on presentation. Almost all of the patients (35/36 or 97%) had either diplopia or blurring of vision, with nasal symptoms as the most common extra-ophthalmic accompanying symptom. Multiple cranial nerve palsies, particularly optic nerve plus at least one ocular motor nerve, was a prominent feature. The combination of nasal symptoms with ophthalmoparesis was noted in 24 patients (67%) and was identified as a red flag for NPCA. Conclusion: Blurred vision and diplopia were the most common ocular complaints of patients with NPCA who were evaluated at the ophthalmology department of a tertiary hospital. Blurred vision is frequently from optic nerve involvement while diplopia is due to ophthalmoparesis secondary to multiple ocular motor cranial nerves involvement. Male patients in their 40s who present with combination of optic neuropathy or ocular motor palsies should be probed for presence of otologic or nasal symptoms as well as neck masses as these are the common presentation of NPCA in the ophthalmology clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.