ArticleNeuroSci2024
Unveiling the Immediate Impact of Prechtl's General Movement Assessment Training on Inter-Rater Reliability and Cerebral Palsy Prediction.
Article in NeuroSci, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effects of maternal diabetes on early infant neurodevelopment with a novel combination of four neurodevelopmental tools.Early human development · 2026Article
- Neonatal encephalopathy in India: spatiotemporal variations in declining mortality.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- [Early resting-state functional connectivity characteristics in preterm and full-term infants: an exploratory study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prechtl's General Movement Assessment (GMA) is a qualitative video assessment that is an early predictor of cerebral palsy (CP) in infants. GMA raters undergo two levels of training: basic and advanced. Using a retrospective study design, we evaluated the impact of the GMA training level on three key measures: inter-rater reliability (IRR), predictability for a later CP diagnosis, and generalizability for both medically trained and non-medically trained raters. As part of a larger study on former level-IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants, participants had a GMA video at 3-4 months of corrected age with parental consent. Four GMA raters with basic training interpreted the videos. Subsequently, two raters underwent advanced training and reinterpreted the videos. We evaluated IRR with Gwet's AC1 coefficient, CP prediction with logistic regression, and generalizability with Gwet's Linearization method and McNemar's test. Following basic GMA training, all four raters had moderate to almost perfect agreement. The CP predictability of the raters' individual GMA scores ranged from 73% to 81%. Advanced GMA training significantly improved IRR and enhanced CP predictability. GMA rater proficiency was similar regardless of medical training. Advanced GMA training improved readers' capabilities to correctly identify abnormal movement patterns and aid in early CP diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.