ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2024
Statistical Significance of Clustering with Multidimensional Scaling.
Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical significance of clustering for count data.Biometrics · 2025Article
- Powerful significance testing for unbalanced clusters.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2025Article
- Local Genomic Surveillance of InvasiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clustering is a fundamental tool for exploratory data analysis. One central problem in clustering is deciding if the clusters discovered by clustering methods are reliable as opposed to being artifacts of natural sampling variation. Statistical significance of clustering (SigClust) is a recently developed cluster evaluation tool for high-dimension, low-sample size data. Despite its successful application to many scientific problems, there are cases where the original SigClust may not work well. Furthermore, for specific applications, researchers may not have access to the original data and only have the dissimilarity matrix. In this case, clustering is still a valuable exploratory tool, but the original SigClust is not applicable. To address these issues, we propose a new SigClust method using multidimensional scaling (MDS). The underlying idea behind MDS-based SigClust is that one can achieve low-dimensional representations of the original data via MDS using only the dissimilarity matrix and then apply SigClust on the low-dimensional MDS space. The proposed MDS-based SigClust can circumvent the challenge of parameter estimation of the original method in high-dimensional spaces while keeping the essential clustering structure in the MDS space. Both simulations and real data applications demonstrate that the proposed method works remarkably well for assessing the statistical significance of clustering. Supplemental materials for the article are available online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.