Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

Effects of online and offline trigeminal nerve stimulation on visuomotor learning.

Diego E Arias, Christopher A Buneo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diego E AriasVisuomotor Learning Lab, School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Christopher A BuneoVisuomotor Learning Lab, School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Funding

Southeast Collaborative Alliance for Stroke Trials (SE-CoAST)U24NS107232 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Christine Holmstedt, TANYA N TURAN · 2018 to 2026
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS107232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A current thrust in neurology involves using exogenous neuromodulation of cranial nerves (e.g, vagus, trigeminal) to treat the signs and symptoms of various neurological disorders. These techniques also have the potential to augment cognitive and/or sensorimotor functions in healthy individuals. Although much is known about the clinical effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS), effects on sensorimotor and cognitive functions such as learning have received less attention, despite their potential impact on neurorehabilitation. Here we describe the results of experiments aimed at assessing the effects of TNS on motor learning, which was behaviorally characterized using an upper extremity visuomotor adaptation paradigm. Objective: Assessing the effects of TNS on motor learning. Methods: Motor learning was behaviorally characterized using an upper extremity visuomotor adaptation paradigm. In Experiment 1, effects of offline TNS using clinically tested frequencies (120 and 60 Hz) were characterized. Sixty-three healthy young adults received TNS before performing a task that involved reaching with perturbed hand visual feedback. In Experiment 2, the effects of 120 and 60 Hz online TNS were characterized with the same task. Sixty-three new participants received either TNS or sham stimulation concurrently with perturbed visual feedback. Results: Experiment 1 results showed that 60 Hz stimulation was associated with slower rates of learning than both sham and 120 Hz stimulation, indicating frequency-dependent effects of TNS. Experiment 2 however showed no significant differences among stimulation groups. A post-hoc, cross-study comparison of the 60 Hz offline and online TNS results showed a statistically significant improvement in learning rates with online stimulation relative to offline, pointing to timing-dependent effects of TNS on visuomotor learning. Discussion: The results indicate that both the frequency and timing of TNS can influence rates of motor learning in healthy adults. This suggests that optimization of one or both parameters could potentially increase learning rates, which would provide new avenues for enhancing performance in healthy individuals and augmenting rehabilitation in patients with sensorimotor dysfunction resulting from stroke or other neurological disorders.

Indexed as

motor learningneuromodulationrehabilitationtrigeminal nerve stimulationvisuomotor perturbation

Identifiers

PMID39483193
PMCPMC11526447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.