Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483144›Full record

ReviewJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2024

Is There a Clinical Benefit of Abdominal Binders After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.

Nicolas Michot, Pablo Ortega-Deballon, Elias Karam, Urs Pabst-Giger, Mehdi Ouaissi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Abdominal binders in postoperative care: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolas MichotDepartment of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau Hospital, Tours University Hospital, Chambray-Lès-Tours, France.
Pablo Ortega-DeballonDepartment of Digestive Surgery, François Mitterand Hospital, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Elias KaramDepartment of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau Hospital, Tours University Hospital, Chambray-Lès-Tours, France.
Urs Pabst-GigerFliedner Fachhochschule, University of Applied Sciences Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mehdi OuaissiDepartment of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau Hospital, Tours University Hospital, Chambray-Lès-Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of incisional hernia following laparotomy varies between 2% and 30%. It is well-established that the need to control several risk factors prior to surgery exists (weight loss before surgery, diabetes control). Postoperative abdominal binder (AB) is often recommended by surgeons, yet evidence on this topic is lacking. The aim of this review was to present current evidence on the use of abdominal binders after abdominal surgery. Material and Methods: A comprehensive literature review between January and May 2024 was conducted using a range of search engines, including PubMed, Science Direct, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Google. The following keywords were used: "abdominal binder," "abdominal support," "hernia," "girdle and hernia," "compression belt and hernia," and "abdominal support and hernia." Results: Sixteen articles were selected for further analysis (7 RCTs, 6 non-RCTs and 3 meta-analyses). None of the studies reported a reduction in the incidence of abdominal dehiscence or incisional hernia. Postoperative use of the AB has been shown to reduce postoperative discomfort and pain for a limited period of up to 48-72 h. There was no discernible difference in the incidence of surgical site complications. Conclusion: The current evidence indicates that the use of AB following abdominal surgery is safe, although no benefit has been established (except 48 h after surgery). AB may enhance comfort in select patients; however, further studies are necessary to justify their routine use, with a particular focus on the medical and economic implications.

Indexed as

abdominal bindersabdominal surgerylaparotomypostoperative complicationspostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID39483144
PMCPMC11524862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.