Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482771›Full record

ReviewMolecular cytogenetics2024

Insights into avian molecular cytogenetics-with reptilian comparisons.

Darren K Griffin, Rafael Kretschmer, Kornsorn Srikulnath, Worapong Singchat, Rebecca E O'Connor, Michael N Romanov

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cytogenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK. D.K.Griffin@kent.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-3226
Rafael KretschmerDepartamento de Ecologia, Zoologia e Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, Pelotas, 96010-900, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-2152
Kornsorn SrikulnathFaculty of Science, Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-7258
Worapong SingchatFaculty of Science, Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7083-6159
Rebecca E O'ConnorSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4270-970X
Michael N RomanovSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK. m.romanov@kent.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3584-4644

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K008226/1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 24/2551-0001269-9International SciKU Branding (ISB), Faculty of Science and Kasetsart University N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In last 100 years or so, much information has been accumulated on avian karyology, genetics, physiology, biochemistry and evolution. The chicken genome project generated genomic resources used in comparative studies, elucidating fundamental evolutionary processes, much of it funded by the economic importance of domestic fowl (which are also excellent model species in many areas). Studying karyotypes and whole genome sequences revealed population processes, evolutionary biology, and genome function, uncovering the role of repetitive sequences, transposable elements and gene family expansion. Knowledge of the function of many genes and non-expressed or identified regulatory components is however still lacking. Birds (Aves) are diverse, have striking adaptations for flight, migration and survival and inhabit all continents most islands. They also have a unique karyotype with ~ 10 macrochromosomes and ~ 30 microchromosomes that are smaller than other reptiles. Classified into Palaeognathae and Neognathae they are evolutionarily close, and a subset of reptiles. Here we overview avian molecular cytogenetics with reptilian comparisons, shedding light on their karyotypes and genome structure features. We consider avian evolution, then avian (followed by reptilian) karyotypes and genomic features. We consider synteny disruptions, centromere repositioning, and repetitive elements before turning to comparative avian and reptilian genomics. In this context, we review comparative cytogenetics and genome mapping in birds as well as Z- and W-chromosomes and sex determination. Finally, we give examples of pivotal research areas in avian and reptilian cytogenomics, particularly physical mapping and map integration of sex chromosomal genes, comparative genomics of chicken, turkey and zebra finch, California condor cytogenomics as well as some peculiar cytogenetic and evolutionary examples. We conclude that comparative molecular studies and improving resources continually contribute to new approaches in population biology, developmental biology, physiology, disease ecology, systematics, evolution and phylogenetic systematics orientation. This also produces genetic mapping information for chromosomes active in rearrangements during the course of evolution. Further insights into mutation, selection and adaptation of vertebrate genomes will benefit from these studies including physical and online resources for the further elaboration of comparative genomics approaches for many fundamental biological questions.

Indexed as

AvianBirdComparative genomicsCytogeneticsCytogenomicsEvolutionGenomeReptileSex chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID39482771
PMCPMC11526677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.