ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2024
Assessing pain management in total joint arthroplasty using the Detroit interventional pain assessment scale-A prospective cohort study.
Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTotal joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, but postoperative pain has been poorly managed. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess how much narcotic medication was prescribed after TJA; (2) assess if patients were satisfied with their pain management; (3) compare these same data between total hip arthroplasty (THA)/total knee arthroplasty (TKA); (4) compare these same data between preoperative opioid users/opioid-naïve patients.
methodsAn IRB-approved prospective study was conducted at a US academic joint replacement practice. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer at three weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively using the Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment (DIPA) scale. Patients verbally rated their pain with their current medication regimen as 0 (no pain), 1 (tolerable pain), or 2 (intolerable pain) on the DIPA scale. Narcotic usage was verified by the Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS). Patients were divided into THA, TKA, previously on opioids, and opioid-naïve groups. Provider efficiency scores reflected pain management satisfaction and were calculated as the percentage of patients reporting no pain or tolerable pain.
resultsOut of 200 patients, the percentage of patients using narcotics and their daily usage (MMEs) significantly decreased from 75.5% (27.5 MMEs) at three weeks to 42.9% (5.3 MMEs) at six months (P < 0.001). In 80% of patients, narcotics taken at six months were prescribed by outside providers. Significantly fewer patients used narcotics at six months for THA (15.4%) compared to TKA (52.7%) (P < 0.021). There was a significant difference in daily narcotic usage between patients who took narcotics preoperatively (22.9 MMEs) and opioid-naïve ones (13.4 MMEs) (P < 0.001). Provider efficiency scores were best at three weeks (76.6%) and three months (70%) but declined at six months (57.2%).
conclusionsNarcotic tapering practices were observed as postoperative daily narcotic intake decreased across six months. However, outside providers prescribed 80% of narcotics at six months, necessitating a better-coordinated practice with surgeons. Patients taking preoperative narcotics experienced higher daily MME requirements than their opioid-naïve counterparts. In terms of the percentage of patients on narcotics, THA is a better procedure for tapering patients off narcotics by six months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.