Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482746›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2024

Current status of bacteriophage therapy for severe bacterial infections.

Teiji Sawa, Kiyoshi Moriyama, Mao Kinoshita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Bacterial immune systems.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026
    Review
  10. Mechanism ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teiji SawaUniversity Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji-Agaru, Kamigyo, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan. anesth@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-9011
Kiyoshi MoriyamaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Mitaka, Japan.
Mao KinoshitaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in the incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a global public health threat. According to a 2019 WHO report, approximately 1.27 million deaths were attributed to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, with many cases linked to specific bacterial species, such as drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. By 2050, the number of deaths caused by these bacteria is predicted to surpass that caused by cancer. In response to this serious situation, phage therapy, an alternative to antibiotic treatment, has gained attention. Phage therapy involves the use of viruses that target specific bacteria to treat infections. This method has proven effective in multiple clinical cases, particularly for patients with severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. For example, there are reports of patients with systemic infections caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter who recovered following phage administration and patients infected with panresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa who were cured by phage therapy. A key feature of phage therapy is its high specificity. Phages infect only specific bacteria and eliminate them. However, this specificity can also be a disadvantage, as careful selection of the appropriate phage for the target bacteria is needed. Additionally, bacteria can develop resistance to phages, potentially reducing treatment effectiveness over time. Efforts are underway to select, combine, and improve phages to address these challenges. In Belgium, a national phage bank has been established, and in the United States, the University of California, San Diego, has founded Innovative Phage Applications and Therapeutics (IPATH), marking significant progress toward the clinical application of phage therapy in the country. As a result, phage therapy is emerging as a component of personalized medicine, offering a new treatment option against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The clinical application of phage therapy is particularly important in life-saving treatments for patients with severe bacterial infections, and its use in conjunction with antibiotics could enhance therapeutic outcomes. Continued research and development of this therapy could provide hope for many more patients in the future.

Identifiers

PMID39482746
PMCPMC11529433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.