Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482707›Full record

Observational studyJournal of translational medicine2024

Enhancing the differential diagnosis of small pulmonary nodules: a comprehensive model integrating plasma methylation, protein biomarkers, and LDCT imaging features.

Meng Yang, Huansha Yu, Hongxiang Feng, Jianghui Duan, Kaige Wang, Bing Tong, Yunzhi Zhang, Wei Li, Ye Wang, Chaoyang Liang and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05432128 (Molecular Typing System for Early Screening and Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Combined With Liquid Biopsy Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05432128 unknown statusnot on this map

Molecular Typing System for Early Screening and Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Combined With Liquid Biopsy Technology

TypeobservationalSponsorSinglera Genomics Inc.Ran2020 to 2025Enrolled600ConditionsLung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Meng Yang *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, Beijing, People's Republic of China. yangm_zoe@163.com.
Huansha Yu *Experimental Animal Center, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hongxiang Feng *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jianghui Duan *Department of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Kaige Wang *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Cheng Du, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Bing Tong *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yunzhi Zhang *Singlera Genomics (Jiangsu) Inc, Shanghai, 201321, China.
Wei LiSinglera Genomics (Jiangsu) Inc, Shanghai, 201321, China.
Ye WangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Cheng Du, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chaoyang LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hongliang SunDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Dingrong ZhongDepartment of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Bei WangDepartment of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Huang ChenDepartment of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chengxiang GongSinglera Genomics (Jiangsu) Inc, Shanghai, 201321, China.
Qiye HeSinglera Genomics (Jiangsu) Inc, Shanghai, 201321, China.
Zhixi SuSinglera Genomics (Jiangsu) Inc, Shanghai, 201321, China. zhixi.su@singleragenomics.com.
Rui LiuSinglera Genomics (Jiangsu) Inc, Shanghai, 201321, China. rliu@singleragenomics.com.
Peng ZhangShanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zhangpeng1121@tongji.edu.cn.

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-NHLHCRF-LX-01National Key Research & Development Program of China 2019YFC1315800National Key Research & Development Program of China 2019YFC1315803National Key Research & Development Program of China 2023YFC2508605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate differentiation between malignant and benign pulmonary nodules, especially those measuring 5-10 mm in diameter, continues to pose a significant diagnostic challenge. This study introduces a novel, precise approach by integrating circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation patterns, protein profiling, and computed tomography (CT) imaging features to enhance the classification of pulmonary nodules.

methodsBlood samples were collected from 419 participants diagnosed with pulmonary nodules ranging from 5 to 30 mm in size, before any disease-altering procedures such as treatment or surgical intervention. High-throughput bisulfite sequencing was used to conduct DNA methylation profiling, while protein profiling was performed utilizing the Olink proximity extension assay. The dataset was divided into a training set and an independent test set. The training set included 162 matched cases of benign and malignant nodules, balanced for sex and age. In contrast, the test set consisted of 46 benign and 49 malignant nodules. By effectively integrating both molecular (DNA methylation and protein profiling) and CT imaging parameters, a sophisticated deep learning-based classifier was developed to accurately distinguish between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.

resultsOur results demonstrate that the integrated model is both accurate and robust in distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules. It achieved an AUC score 0.925 (sensitivity = 83.7%, specificity = 82.6%) in classifying test set. The performance of the integrated model was significantly higher than that of individual methylation (AUC = 0.799, P = 0.004), protein (AUC = 0.846, P = 0.009), and imaging models (AUC = 0.866, P = 0.01). Importantly, the integrated model achieved a higher AUC of 0.951 (sensitivity = 83.9%, specificity = 89.7%) in 5-10 mm small nodules. These results collectively confirm the accuracy and robustness of our model in detecting malignant nodules from benign ones.

conclusionsOur study presents a promising noninvasive approach to distinguish the malignancy of pulmonary nodules using multiple molecular and imaging features, which has the potential to assist in clinical decision-making.

trial registrationThis study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 01/01/2020 (NCT05432128). https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05432128 .

Indexed as

DNA MethylationTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesROC CurveSolitary Pulmonary NoduleBiomarkers, TumorCell-free DNA methylationImagingIntegrated modelProtein profilingPulmonary nodules classification

Identifiers

PMID39482707
PMCPMC11526513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.