Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482689›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Perspectives of cancer consumer representatives on their involvement in healthcare service improvement: a qualitative study.

Dan Luo, Jane McGlashan, Klay Lamprell, Gaston Arnolda, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Yvonne Zurynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Embedding Consumer-Led Research in a Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Perceptions and Experiences of Consumer Representatives on Patient Safety Investigation Teams: A Qualitative Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan LuoAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jane McGlashanAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Klay LamprellAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gaston ArnoldaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yvonne ZurynskiAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. yvonne.zurynski@mq.edu.au.

Funding

NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology 1135048NHMRC Partnership Centre of Health System Sustainability 9100002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumer involvement in healthcare service organisation and policy development is recognised globally as a vital strategy in improving the quality and patient-centredness of care. There are significant gaps in knowledge about consumer involvement in practice, including consumers' engagement in the process of enhancing cancer services. This study aimed to explore consumers' perspectives on their involvement in cancer service improvement.

methodsCancer consumer representatives were recruited through Victorian Integrated Cancer Services, Australia. Eligible consumers were, or had been, a member of a health service improvement-related committee or project and attended at least one meeting with health professionals. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted online and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsSix experienced consumer representatives were interviewed. Perspectives on their involvement in improving cancer services were categorised into three major topics. The first addressed personal aspects of involvement, in which participants described personal motivations (e.g., having lived experience of cancer themselves or in their family), challenges encountered in committee involvement, experiences of received support in their role as a consumer representative, concerns about narrow representation, and their evolving identity as a consumer representative. The second discussed practical contributions made by consumer representatives to improve systems and services. Participants detailed their active engagement with committees and consumer-led projects, contributing both their cancer experiences and general or professional skills. The third topic focused on directions for improving consumer involvement in the health system. Suggestions highlighted widening consumer representation to include often marginalised voices to inform decision-making at local committee and health system levels.

conclusionsThis study enhances the real-world understanding of the role that consumer representatives play in improving cancer health services. The strategies suggested in our research provide the opportunity to enhance consumer involvement and pave the way for more effective cancer service planning and implementation across diverse healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQuality ImprovementVictoriaCancer servicesConsumer involvementPatient advocacyQualitative researchQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID39482689
PMCPMC11526679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.