ArticleBMC health services research2024
Service evaluation of an early pregnancy loss support clinic in an inner London early pregnancy unit.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly pregnancy loss (EPL) can have profound implications for physical and psychological health. In the UK, significant variation in service provision exists for women affected by EPL. There is very little guidance on what hospital-based follow-up support services should entail, and how these can be implemented and integrated into current care provision to meet the needs of women who experience EPL. This service evaluation (SE) reports on an Early Pregnancy Loss Support Clinic (EPLSC) in an inner-city Hospital Trust.
methodsThis SE gathered both quantitative and qualitative feedback from women to assess the value of a locally implemented Early Pregnancy Loss Support Clinic (EPLSC). Quantitative feedback was collected using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) questionnaire and the Visual Anxiety Scale (VAS-A), both administered to women attending the EPLSC. Qualitative feedback was collected through semi-structured interviews and focused on four pre-determined themes based on EPL literature - physical health, mental health, role of the bereavement midwife and overall service user experience. Quantitative feedback was summarised using descriptive statistics, while qualitative feedback was analysed using framework analysis.
resultsA total of 127 women were invited to the EPLSC, with 110 (87%) attending, and 17 (13%) not attending their appointment. SAPS scores ranged from 21 to 28, indicating that women were either satisfied or very satisfied with the care they received at the EPLSC. Results from VAS-A scores showed that 76 (69%) women reported a decrease in anxiety immediately after attending the EPLSC, compared to 8 (7%) who reported no change or a small increase in anxiety. Qualitative findings highlighted women's concerns around future fertility, the importance of emotional support and the value of connecting with the bereavement midwife.
conclusionAn EPLSC that focuses on providing emotional support and reassurance, particularly regarding future fertility, is important to women. Further rigorous evaluation of national disparities in EPL follow-up is urgently needed to assess the gaps in clinical care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.