Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482669›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Teleradiology in Saudi Arabia: a national survey and retrospective review of associated MRI reports.

Ashwag Rafea Alruwaili, Abdulelah Ammash Alshammari, Fahad Mithal Alsalhi, Sukaina Ahmed Aldamen, Hend Saleh Alamri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashwag Rafea AlruwailiRadiological Sciences Department, King Saud University, Office 60, Building 11, Female Campus, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. ashalruwaili@ksu.edu.sa.
Abdulelah Ammash AlshammariHead of Radiology, Rafha Central Hospital, Ministry of Health, Rafha, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad Mithal AlsalhiPublic Health Deputyship in the Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sukaina Ahmed AldamenDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hend Saleh AlamriRadiological Sciences Department, King Saud University, Office 60, Building 11, Female Campus, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the recent evolution of telecommunications, it is now acknowledged that digital communication provides essential services for remote areas. Teleradiology allows the ability to obtain images at one site, send them over a distance, and view them remotely for diagnostic or consultation purposes.

aimThe highlighted objectives include (a) the added value of the service, (b) user satisfaction, and (c) quality assurance according to global best practices and national quality standards.

methodsThis study utilised an eight-part online self-report survey distributed among employees of the Ministry of Health (MOH) who use the national teleradiology platform. The survey sections were designed to gather comprehensive data, including participant demographics, levels of satisfaction with the service, awareness of security measures, communication effectiveness, perceived advantages and disadvantages, quality assurance, technical challenges, IT support, and future perceptions of teleradiology services. Additionally, a total of 212 MRI reports from patients who underwent brain and spine MRI examinations between 2018 and 2020 were collected from the platform to strengthen the analysis.

resultsMost survey respondents (78%) were males, with a significant majority (96.2%) affirming that teleradiology sufficiently addresses clinical inquiries. Furthermore, 90% expressed satisfaction with the service, and 93% endorsed the standardization of MR imaging procedures across Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals. Notably, 92.4% recognised teleradiology as a transformative strategy for healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia, concurring with its benefits. The analysis of the MRI reports revealed structural inconsistencies; compared with structured templates, the average number of incorporated elements was reduced, and essential elements were frequently absent. Intriguingly, reports delineating normal cases included a higher incidence of clinical impressions relative to those describing abnormalities, yet the latter contained a more comprehensive array of elements. Variability in report composition was correlated with the years of experience of the reporters. Teleradiology users perceived enhancements in the quality of radiological reporting and the daily operational workflow. Nonetheless, certain limitations were identified, necessitating focused improvements by service providers.

conclusionDespite teleradiology being a subspecialisation, it can reduce the role of local radiologists. Further research is needed on data security, confidentiality, and archiving options, as well as the cost-effectiveness of teleradiology services.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTeleradiologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital communicationHealthcare deliveryNeuroimagingQuality assuranceTeleradiology

Identifiers

PMID39482669
PMCPMC11529316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.