Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
A retrospective analysis on optimal medical therapy for patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a French observational study.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) should have an optimal management in terms of lipid goal [i.e. controlled LDL-cholesterol (LDLc)] and medical treatment (triple therapy with an antiplatelet agent, a statin and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a angiotensin-receptor antagonist). Prevalence of LEAD patients with a LDLc < 0.55 g/l is unknown. Aims of this study were to: (i) describe the prevalence of patients with a LDLc < 0.55 g/l, (ii) describe the prevalence of patients with an optimal medical treatment; (iii) compare this management between patients with a vascular surgery history and those without a vascular surgery history; and (iv) evaluate the number of patients eligible for new lipid-lowering therapies according to FOURIER and REDUCE-IT criteria.
methodsIn this single-center retrospective study, prevalence is expressed as numbers and percentages. Comparison of the number of well managed patients between LEAD patients with a vascular surgery history and those without was performed. Number of patients who would be eligible for FOURIER and REDUCE-IT studies were calculated.
resultsAmong the LEAD patients included in the analysis (n = 225), only 12.4% (n = 28) had a LDLc < 0.55 g/L. The prevalence of patients who received the optimal medical treatment was 50.7% (n = 114). There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of patients with and without vascular surgery history achieving the LDLc goal (n = 9 (10.6%) vs. n = 19 (13.6%); p = not significant). Ninety-three patients (46.0%) would be eligible for EVOLOCUMAB treatment according to the Fourier study design whereas 17 patients (8.4%) would be eligible for treatment with ICOSAPENT ETHYL according to the REDUCE-IT study design.
conclusionA majority of LEAD patients did not reach the LDLc goals. LEAD patients with a vascular surgery history did not experience a better management whereas they had a more consistent follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.