ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Direct anterior decompression in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament significantly relieves short-segment spinal cord high signal.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anterior cervical decompression improves medial plantar pressure in OPLL with gait disturbance: a 24-month retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine (OPLL), high spinal cord signal (HCS) is frequently observed in the spinal cord of the corresponding segment. However, studies on the differences in the improvement of high spinal cord signal due to different surgical approaches are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the improvement of high spinal cord signal in long and short segments with different choices of surgical approaches.
methodsIn this study, we conducted a meticulous review of medical records for patients diagnosed with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Demographic variables, including gender, age, and body mass index (BMI), were systematically recorded. We evaluated the severity of neurological impairment using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores both preoperatively and at multiple postoperative follow-up points. Neurological assessments were complemented by serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) to measure the extent of high-signal changes (HCS) in the spinal cord, and the alteration of the HCS was quantified by the SCR (the ratio between the signal intensity value of the HCS region and the signal intensity value of the normal spinal cord region at C7-T1).
resultsIn the short-segment high signal change (HCS) group, comparisons of JOA score improvement (Recovery1) and HCS improvement (CR1) at 6 months postoperatively did not demonstrate significant differences between the surgical approaches (P > 0.05; Table 1). However, at the 2-year follow-up, patients who underwent anterior surgery exhibited significantly greater improvements in both JOA scores (Recovery2) and HCS (CR2), with statistical significance achieved (P < 0.05; Table 1). In contrast, in the long-segment HCS group, there was no significant difference between the anterior and posterior surgical approaches in terms of JOA improvement and HCS improvement at 6 months and 2 years postoperatively (P > 0.05; Table 2).
conclusionsIn patients with OPLL who present with spinal cord high signal, anterior surgery by resection of the ossified posterior longitudinal ligament and direct decompression is more conducive to regression of small spinal cord high signal and improvement of clinical neurological function if the extent of spinal cord high signal is small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.