ReviewBMC genomics2024
A stepwise guide for pangenome development in crop plants: an alfalfa (Medicago sativa) case study.
Review in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pangenome framework uncovers the role of deletions in repeated evolution of cave-derived traits.Genome research · 2026Article
- Integrating deep learning and pangenomics to recover missing heritability from wild structural variations.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Emerging zoonotic risks: whole-genome sequencing reveals antimicrobial resistance and genomic diversity in Providencia stuartii isolated from broiler chickens in Noakhali, Bangladesh.Poultry science · 2026Article
- A telomere-to-telomere gap-free genome of the new cultivar 'Zhongtian No. 5', combined with pan-genome analysis, aids in exploration and genetic enhancement of red clover (Horticulture research · 2026Article
- The pangenome: a statistical model, not a fixed biological property.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
- Genomic resources for Australian alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genomics: reformatted reference genome, annotated variants, gene presence-absence and diversity analysis from genome re-sequencing.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- High-quality phased genome assemblies of line-bred Korean Hanwoo cattle.Scientific data · 2025Article
- De novo annotation reveals transcriptomic complexity across the hexaploid wheat pan-genome.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Advances in basic biology of alfalfa (Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Exploration of gene presence/absence variations inOpen biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of pangenomics and the importance of structural variants is gaining recognition within the plant genomics community. Due to advancements in sequencing and computational technology, it has become feasible to sequence the entire genome of numerous individuals of a single species at a reasonable cost. Pangenomes have been constructed for many major diploid crops, including rice, maize, soybean, sorghum, pearl millet, peas, sunflower, grapes, and mustards. However, pangenomes for polyploid species are relatively scarce and are available in only few crops including wheat, cotton, rapeseed, and potatoes. MAIN BODY: In this review, we explore the various methods used in crop pangenome development, discussing the challenges and implications of these techniques based on insights from published pangenome studies. We offer a systematic guide and discuss the tools available for constructing a pangenome and conducting downstream analyses. Alfalfa, a highly heterozygous, cross pollinated and autotetraploid forage crop species, is used as an example to discuss the concerns and challenges offered by polyploid crop species. We conducted a comparative analysis using linear and graph-based methods by constructing an alfalfa graph pangenome using three publicly available genome assemblies. To illustrate the intricacies captured by pangenome graphs for a complex crop genome, we used five different gene sequences and aligned them against the three graph-based pangenomes. The comparison of the three graph pangenome methods reveals notable variations in the genomic variation captured by each pipeline.
conclusionPangenome resources are proving invaluable by offering insights into core and dispensable genes, novel gene discovery, and genome-wide patterns of variation. Developing user-friendly online portals for linear pangenome visualization has made these resources accessible to the broader scientific and breeding community. However, challenges remain with graph-based pangenomes including compatibility with other tools, extraction of sequence for regions of interest, and visualization of genetic variation captured in pangenome graphs. These issues necessitate further refinement of tools and pipelines to effectively address the complexities of polyploid, highly heterozygous, and cross-pollinated species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.