ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staging and imaging-based prognostication in renal cell carcinoma: current guidelines and practical considerations.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreoperative evaluation of inferior vena cava (IVC) wall invasion is very important to improve outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and may allow surgical urologists to treat the IVC more effectively. The objective of this study was to evaluate preoperative
methodsThis retrospective case-control study evaluated 68 patients with RCC with level I-IV tumor thrombus. According to the histopathologic examination result, the patients were divided into IVC wall invasion group and non-invasion group. The
resultsSixty-eight patients were evaluated, and 55.9% (38/68) had IVC wall invasion. Compared with non-invasion group, invasion group had higher SUVmax of RCC, higher SURmax (tumor to tumor thrombus ratio, Tu/Th), higher IVCTT coronal diameter, and longer IVCTT craniocaudal extent (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that SURmax (Tu/Th) (OR 8.760 [95%CI, 1.019-75.310]; p = 0.048) and the maximum coronal diameter of IVCTT (OR 1.143 [95%CI, 1.029-1.269]; p = 0.028) were predictors of IVC wall invasion. A model combining SURmax (Tu/Th) and the maximum coronal diameter of IVCTT achieved an AUC of 0.855 (95%CI, 0.757-0.954). The specificity and sensitivity for assessing IVC wall invasion was 92.1% and 76.7%, respectively.
conclusionsIncreases in SURmax (Tu/Th) and the maximum coronal diameter of IVCTT are associated with a higher probability of IVC wall invasion. Preoperative
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.