Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482552›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2024

Inhibition of return in a 3D scene depends on the direction of depth switch between cue and target.

Hanna Haponenko, Noah Britt, Brett Cochrane, Hong-Jin Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanna HaponenkoDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. haponeh@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3291-2568
Noah BrittDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Brett CochraneDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Hong-Jin SunDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) is a phenomenon that reflects slower target detection when the target appears at a previously cued rather than uncued location. In the present study, we investigated the extent to which IOR occurs in three-dimensional (3D) scenes comprising pictorial depth information. Peripheral cues and targets appeared on top of 3D rectangular boxes placed on the surface of a textured ground plane in virtual space. When the target appeared at a farther location than the cue, the magnitude of the IOR effect in the 3D condition remained similar to the values found in the two-dimensional (2D) control condition (IOR was depth-blind). When the target appeared at a nearer location than the cue, the magnitude of the IOR effect was significantly attenuated (IOR was depth-specific). The present findings address inconsistencies in the literature on the effect of depth on IOR and support the notion that visuospatial attention exhibits a near-space advantage even in 3D scenes consisting entirely of pictorial depth information.

Indexed as

AttentionCuesDepth PerceptionInhibition, PsychologicalOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleOrientation, SpatialReaction TimeSpace PerceptionYoung AdultInhibition of returnSpatial attentionThree-dimensional spaceVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39482552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.