Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482499›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Exploring optimal methods for age-at-death estimation using pulp/tooth area ratios: a South African study.

Daniël Kotze, Calvin G Mole, Vincent M Phillips, Victoria E Gibbon

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniël KotzeDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7495-7137
Calvin G MoleDivision of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8483-8190
Vincent M PhillipsDepartment of Oral Pathology and Forensic Sciences, Oral Health Centre, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-6274
Victoria E GibbonDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935, South Africa. victoria.gibbon@uct.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-3297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-at-death estimation is pivotal in the identification of unknown human decedents in forensic medicine. The pulp/tooth area ratio (PAR) method, assessing pulp cavity size as a marker of secondary dentine apposition, is widely utilised for adult age estimation. Despite extensive evaluation of this technique, the influence of image type and enamel area inclusion on method accuracy is insufficiently explored. The present study evaluated the PAR method's applicability using maxillary canines from a South African cadaveric sample, examining reliability, sex bias, and accuracy across different image types and enamel area considerations. An observational, cross-sectional study design was followed. Fifty-two adult maxillary canines were radiographed, sectioned, and analysed using stereomicroscopy. Labiolingual and mesiodistal periapical radiographs, alongside labiolingual stereomicroscopic tooth section images, were analysed using ImageJ to calculate PARs. Age estimation linear regression models were developed for each image type, with and without enamel area inclusion. Models were compared for performance and accuracy using best-subsets regression and cross-validation analyses. Results indicated that the PAR method is a reliable, sex-independent technique, providing relatively accurate age-at-death estimates for South African adults. Image type significantly influenced accuracy, with tooth section images exhibiting the best/lowest error values, followed by labiolingual and mesiodistal radiographs, respectively. Exclusion of enamel area consistently enhanced model performance across all image types. This study contributes valuable data to the underexplored field of dental age estimation techniques for South African adults, highlighting optimal approaches when applying the PAR method to maxillary canines. Additionally, it introduces a refined stereomicroscopic technique, augmenting and enhancing existing practices.

Indexed as

Age Determination by TeethCuspidDental PulpDental Pulp CavityAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleForensic DentistryHumansLinear ModelsMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSouth AfricaAge estimationCanine teethDental radiographyForensic sciencesLegal medicinePulp/tooth area ratio

Identifiers

PMID39482499
PMCPMC11850563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.