Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

FACSNet: Forensics aided content selection network for heterogeneous image steganalysis.

Siyuan Huang, Minqing Zhang, Yongjun Kong, Yan Ke, Fuqiang Di

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siyuan HuangCollege of Cryptographic Engineering, Engineering University of PAP, Xi'an, 710086, China.
Minqing ZhangCollege of Cryptographic Engineering, Engineering University of PAP, Xi'an, 710086, China. api_zmq@126.com.
Yongjun KongCollege of Cryptographic Engineering, Engineering University of PAP, Xi'an, 710086, China.
Yan KeCollege of Cryptographic Engineering, Engineering University of PAP, Xi'an, 710086, China.
Fuqiang DiCollege of Cryptographic Engineering, Engineering University of PAP, Xi'an, 710086, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62272478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of image steganalysis, as a technique of confrontation with steganography, is to determine the presence or absence of secret information in conjunction with the specific statistical characteristics of the carrier. With the development of deep learning technology in recent years, the performance of steganography has been gradually enhanced. Especially for the complex reality environment, the image content is mixed and heterogeneous, which brings great challenges to the practical application of image steganalysis technology. In order to solve this problem, we design a forensics aided content selection network (FACSNet) for heterogeneous image steganalysis. Considering the heterogeneous situation of real images, a forensics aided module is introduced to pre-categorise the images to be tested, so that the network is able to detect different categories of images in a more targeted way. The complexity of the images is also further analysed and classified using the content selection module to train a more adapted steganalyser. By doing this, the network is allowed to achieve better performance in recognising and classifying the heterogeneous images for detection. Experimental results show that our designed FACSNet is able to achieve excellent detection performance in heterogeneous environments, improving the detection accuracy by up to 7.14% points, with certain robustness and practicality.

Indexed as

Content selectionDeep learningForensics aidedSteganalysisSteganography

Identifiers

PMID39482418
PMCPMC11528074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.