ArticleCommunications biology2024
REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC): a consensus methodology for harnessing multiple cryo-EM particle pickers.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An unattended image-processing pipeline for on-the-fly quality assessment and 3D exploration in cryo-EM.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Discovery in Life Sciences.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2026Review
- REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC): a consensus methodology for harnessing multiple cryo-EM particle pickers.Communications biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryo-EM particle identification from micrographs ("picking") is challenging due to the low signal-to-noise ratio and lack of ground truth for particle locations. State-of-the-art computational algorithms ("pickers") identify different particle sets, complicating the selection of the best-suited picker for a protein of interest. Here, we present REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC), a computational approach to identifying particles common to the output of multiple pickers. We frame consensus particle picking as a graph problem, which REPIC solves using integer linear programming. REPIC picks high-quality particles even when the best picker is not known a priori or a protein is difficult-to-pick (e.g., NOMPC ion channel). Reconstructions using consensus particles without particle filtering achieve resolutions comparable to those from particles picked by experts. Our results show that REPIC requires minimal (often no) manual intervention, and considerably reduces the burden on cryo-EM users for picker selection and particle picking. Availability: https://github.com/ccameron/REPIC .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.