Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482396›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

Reliability, reference values and factors related to maximum bite force measured by the Innobyte system in healthy adults with natural dentitions.

Mireia Ustrell-Barral, Carla Zamora-Olave, Laura Khoury-Ribas, Bernat Rovira-Lastra, Jordi Martinez-Gomis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Investigating the maximum bite force and speech intelligibility in patients requiring prosthetic rehabilitation.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mireia Ustrell-BarralDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona. C/ Feixa Llarga S/N, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Carla Zamora-OlaveDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona. C/ Feixa Llarga S/N, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Laura Khoury-RibasDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona. C/ Feixa Llarga S/N, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Bernat Rovira-LastraDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona. C/ Feixa Llarga S/N, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Jordi Martinez-GomisDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona. C/ Feixa Llarga S/N, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. jmartinezgomis@ub.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to determine the predictors of maximum bite force (MBF), as measured with the Innobyte system, and to assess the reliability and reference values for MBF in young adults with natural dentitions.

methodsThis cross-sectional test-retest study included 101 dental students with natural dentitions. Participants had their dental occlusion examined and completed three questionnaires: the Temporomandibular disorders Pain Screener, Oral Behavior Checklist, and Jaw Functional Limitation Scale. Body mass index and muscle mass percentage were determined, and handgrip strength was measured with a dynamometer. The MBF was measured with Innobyte, with reliability assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient, expressing reference values as MBF percentiles. Bivariate tests and multiple linear regression models were used for statistical analysis.

resultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient for the MBF was 0.90, with 10th to 90th percentiles of 487-876 N for females and 529-1003 N for males. A positive relationship existed between the MBF and male sex, muscle mass percentage, overbite, handgrip strength, and possible sleep/awake bruxism. Stepwise regression showed that overbite, handgrip strength, and possible sleep/awake bruxism had the greatest effect on the MBF, explaining 27% of the variation.

conclusionsThis study provides reference values for MBF when using the Innobyte system and shows excellent reliability. Overbite, general strength, and self-reported bruxism appear to be important predictors of MBF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Innobyte is a reliable device that can be used to measure MBF bilaterally. Self-reported bruxism is associated with an 8%-10% increase in MBF.

Indexed as

Bite ForceHand StrengthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBite forceBruxismHandgrip strengthOverbiteReference valuesReliability

Identifiers

PMID39482396
PMCPMC11527963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.