ArticleScientific reports2024
A prediction nomogram for mortality in patients following wasp stings: a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histopathological Spectrum of Acute Kidney Injury After Wasp Sting Envenomation.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Emergency response and clinical treatment analysis of a mass wasp sting incident involving 38 tourists: A case report.Medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with multiple wasp stings in southwest China.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Development and Internal Validation of a Predictive Nomogram for Assessing Rhabdomyolysis Risk After Wasp Stings: A Multicenter Study in Sichuan, China.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
- From sting to STING: role of inflammation in wasp sting induced AKI - a narrative review.BMC nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that wasp stings can lead to serious, sometimes fatal, health outcomes. Predicting deaths associated with wasp stings remains challenging yet is of critical importance. This study was conducted to identify predictors and develop a visual model for predicting mortality following wasp stings. Clinical data from 486 patients were analyzed, dividing them into two groups: survival group (N = 435) and death group (N = 51). Various statistical methods were used to create a prognostic model, including one-way analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and binary logistic regression. The model's accuracy was evaluated through ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The study identified four key predictors of mortality: receiving more than 50 stings, having serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels of ≥ 2200 U/L, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of ≥ 90 s, and the requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 h. These factors contributed to a model with an area under the ROC curve of 0.980 (95% CI: [0.968-0.992]), indicating high calibration and applicability. The decision curve analysis confirmed the model's substantial net clinical benefit. Thus, the number of stings, serum LDH, APTT, and the need for early invasive mechanical ventilation are reliable, independent predictors of death among patients experiencing wasp stings. The developed predictive model exhibits high levels of accuracy, sensitivity, consistency, and practical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.