Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Characterizing the photoluminescence of fluorescein-labeled cellulose in aqueous and alcohol solutions: influence of the cellulose backbone.

Chi-Yang Yen, Shailesh Rana, Kamlesh Awasthi, Nobuhiro Ohta, Masahito Oh-E

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chi-Yang YenInstitute of Photonics Technologies, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Sec. 2 Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, 300044, Taiwan.
Shailesh RanaDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Institute of Molecular Science, Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta-Hsueh Road, Hsinchu, 300093, Taiwan.
Kamlesh AwasthiDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Institute of Molecular Science, Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta-Hsueh Road, Hsinchu, 300093, Taiwan.
Nobuhiro OhtaDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Institute of Molecular Science, Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta-Hsueh Road, Hsinchu, 300093, Taiwan. nohta@nycu.edu.tw.
Masahito Oh-EInstitute of Photonics Technologies, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Sec. 2 Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, 300044, Taiwan. oh-e@ee.nthu.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 111-2113-M-A49-015National Science and Technology Council 111-2221-E-007-023Profound Material Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan NTHU no. 112A0227P1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many dyes have been introduced into cellulose, whether bound to its backbone or within a cellulose matrix, few studies have determined whether the backbone statically or dynamically quenches the photoluminescence of the dye. To advance cellulosic fluorescent films, the influence of the cellulose backbone on photoluminescence must be understood. We determined the fluorescence properties of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and fluorescein-labeled cellulose (FLC) in water and alcohol, including their quantum yields [Formula: see text], lifetimes [Formula: see text], and rates of radiative [Formula: see text] and nonradiative [Formula: see text] decay. Dissolved FLC had a ~ 30× lower [Formula: see text] than FITC, suggesting that incorporating FITC into the cellulose backbone remarkably reduces the fluorescence efficiency. The FLC solutions had a six-fold lower [Formula: see text] than their FITC counterparts but a 10-20 times higher [Formula: see text]. Presumably, this was because the cellulose backbone interacted weakly with the fluorescein moieties, suggesting a quenching mechanism that can be termed quasi-static, corresponding to static quenching between the fluorescein moieties and cellulose backbone, in addition to the fluorescence quenching caused by the intramolecular nonradiative processes of fluorescein, as observed in conventional molecules. Using the Strickler‒Berg formula, we deduced the analytical radiative decay rate constants [Formula: see text] and eventually estimated the number of very short-lived fluorescein moieties per single fluorescent fluorescein moiety, corresponding well with static quenching.

Indexed as

CelluloseFluoresceinFluorescenceLifetimePhotoluminescenceQuenching

Identifiers

PMID39482331
PMCPMC11528010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.