Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39481580›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2024

Integrating existing and novel methods to understand organizational context: A case study of an academic-public health department partnership.

Larry R Hearld, Madeline C Pratt, Donna Smith, Mariel Parman, Rendi Murphree, Kevin P Michaels, Stephanie Woods-Crawford, Aadia I Rana, Lynn T Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Larry R HearldDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: lhearld@uab.edu.
Madeline C PrattDivision of Infectious Diseases, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Donna SmithDivision of Infectious Diseases, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Mariel ParmanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Rendi MurphreeMobile County Health Department, Mobile, AL, United States.
Kevin P MichaelsMobile County Health Department, Mobile, AL, United States.
Stephanie Woods-CrawfordMobile County Health Department, Mobile, AL, United States.
Aadia I RanaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Lynn T MatthewsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Funding

A type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate a population health combination intervention to meet HIV testing, linkage, and viral suppression goals in coastal AlabamaR01AI169671 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Lynn T Matthews, Aadia Rana · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
Mentoring in patient-oriented research on HIV prevention in the U.S. and Global SouthK24AI184259 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Lynn T Matthews · 2025 to 2026
$361k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI184259NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI169671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this manuscript we illustrate how implementation science (IS) researchers and practitioners can deploy and integrate existing and novel methods to develop a more comprehensive understanding of organizational context, particularly organizational routines and processes, to inform adaptation and implementation of evidence-based interventions.

methodsThe work reported here was part of a broader investigation of how to adapt and implement a three-component combination intervention in a county health department in Mobile, Alabama. Based on pre-implementation efforts to assess local context and barriers to implementation, we first describe three approaches that can be effectively used to elucidate organizational routines and processes, followed by a description of how these approaches were applied in our study. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned and recommendations for how these approaches can be applied and improved upon by other IS researchers. RESULTS/

conclusionsMultiple methods used iteratively and collaboratively with implementation partners can enhance our understanding of nuanced organizational routines and better inform efforts to adapt and implement evidence-based interventions in complex organizational settings.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceAlabamaEvidence-Based PracticeHumansOrganizational Case StudiesPublic HealthPublic Health AdministrationCollaborative process mappingEvidence-based intervention adaptationImplementation scienceMultiple methodsOrganizational routines

Identifiers

PMID39481580
PMCPMC11625600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.