Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39481470›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2025

Closed-Loop Systems and Real-Time Neurofeedback in Mindfulness Meditation Research.

Joseph C C Chen, David A Ziegler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Introduction to the Special Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience of Mindfulness.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph C C ChenDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Neuroscape, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
David A ZieglerDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Neuroscape, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: David.Ziegler@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Optimizing a closed-loop digital meditation intervention for remediating cognitive decline and reducing stress in older adultsR01AG076668 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADAM H GAZZALEY, David A Ziegler · 2022 to 2026
$5.8M
Enhancing Cognitive Control in Older Adults with Complementary InterventionsR01AG049424 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AREAN, PATRICIA A., GAZZALEY, ADAM H · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
A Pilot Study of the Impact of Personalized Digital Meditation on Improving Cognition and Sleep and Reducing Stress in MCIR61AG083503 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WALSH, CHRISTINE MAIREAD, ZIEGLER, DAVID A · 2023 to 2024
$1.0M
Accelerating Cognitive Gains from Digital Meditation with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Pilot Study in MCIR61AG080528 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZANTO, THEODORE P, ZIEGLER, DAVID A · 2023 to 2024
$1.0M
Mechanisms of self-regulation of internal distractionR21AG041071 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GAZZALEY, ADAM H · 2011 to 2012
$382k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049424NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076668NIA NIH HHS R21 AG041071NIA NIH HHS R61 AG080528NIA NIH HHS R61 AG083503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mindfulness meditation has numerous purported benefits for psychological well-being; however, problems such as adherence to mindfulness tasks, quality of mindfulness sessions, or dosage of mindfulness interventions may hinder individuals from accessing the purported benefits of mindfulness. Methodologies including closed-loop systems and real-time neurofeedback may provide tools to help bolster success in mindfulness task performance, titrate the exposure to mindfulness interventions, or improve engagement with mindfulness sessions. In this review, we explore the use of closed-loop systems and real-time neurofeedback to influence, augment, or promote mindfulness interventions. Various closed-loop neurofeedback signals from functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography have been used to provide subjective correlates of mindfulness states including functional magnetic resonance imaging region-of-interest-based signals (e.g., posterior cingulate cortex), functional magnetic resonance imaging network-based signals (e.g., default mode network, central executive network, salience network), and electroencephalography spectral-based signals (e.g., alpha, theta, and gamma bands). Past research has focused on how successful interventions have aligned with the subjective mindfulness meditation experience. Future research may pivot toward using appropriate control conditions (e.g., mindfulness only or sham neurofeedback) to quantify the effects of closed-loop systems and neurofeedback-guided mindfulness meditation in improving cognition and well-being.

Indexed as

BrainMeditationMindfulnessNeurofeedbackElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingClosed-loopEEGfMRIMeditationMindfulnessNeurofeedback

Identifiers

PMID39481470
PMCPMC13050520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.