ArticleClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology2024
Therapeutic Effectiveness of SNOT 22-Based Interdose Interval Adjustment of Dupilumab for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.
Article in Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Dupilumab Extended Interval Dosing in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Strategies for Tapering the Dosage of Biologics Targeting Type 2 Inflammation: A Systematic Review.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Pooled it
- Depemokimab: A twice yearly anti-IL 5 biologic for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) - A narrative review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Nationwide Real-World Prescribing Patterns of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps and Asthma.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
- "Super-Responders" to Dupilumab Treatment in Patients With Primary Diffuse Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.Allergy · 2026Article
- Extension of Dupilumab Injection Intervals in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Real-World Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role of Innate T Cells in Inflammatory Disorders in Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2026Review
- Impact of prednisolone tapering and extended dupilumab dosing intervals on comorbid asthma in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Article
- Long-Term Real-World Outcomes and Insights of Biologic Therapies in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: Current Status and Clinical Considerations in Korea.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2025Review
- Chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps: the state-of-the-art of current treatment strategies and future developments.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluates the enduring efficacy and patient satisfaction of dupilumab with interdose interval adjustments based on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients who had been treated with dupilumab for over 6 months. This study targeted individuals diagnosed with CRSwNP according to the 2020 edition of the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Criteria. The treatment involved an add-on dupilumab regimen, where the interdose interval was adjusted based on the SNOT-22 scores. Dosage adjustments were made such that patients with initial SNOT-22 scores greater than 40 were tapered to a target level of 20 or less. Similarly, for patients with initial scores of 40 or less, the treatment aimed for an improvement of 50% or more. At each visit, the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated using SNOT-22, nasal polyp scores (NPS), and a subjective satisfaction questionnaire adapted from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v.1.4).
resultsThe adjustment of the interdose interval for dupilumab based on SNOT-22 scores demonstrated sustained improvements in patients' subjective symptoms, satisfaction, and NPS. The mean (standard deviation) SNOT-22 scores significantly decreased from 46.04 (22.30) to 14.72 (13.66) over 6 months (P<0.001). Similarly, NPS scores improved from 3.20 (2.24) to 1.72 (1.46) within the same period (P<0.001). Satisfaction scores, ranging from 0 to 5, consistently remained above 3.5 for up to 6 months (P=0.166). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between the improvement in the nasal symptom domain of the SNOT-22 scores and higher satisfaction scores.
conclusionAdjusting dupilumab dosing intervals based on SNOT-22 scores from the outset resulted in sustained efficacy and patient satisfaction in Korean patients with CRSwNP. This approach will meaningfully assist clinicians in determining the optimal dupilumab dosing interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.