ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2024
3D genome topology distinguishes molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular profiling of pediatric medulloblastoma in Kazakhstan: Genomic alterations, subgroup distribution, and survival.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomarkers of Treatment Response in Paediatric Medulloblastoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Decoding the immune microenvironment: precision immunotherapy for medulloblastoma subtypes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Targeting processive transcription for Myc-driven circuitry in medulloblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Four main medulloblastoma (MB) molecular subtypes have been identified based on transcriptional, DNA methylation, and genetic profiles. However, it is currently not known whether 3D genome architecture differs between MB subtypes. To address this question, we performed in situ Hi-C to reconstruct the 3D genome architecture of MB subtypes. In total, we generated Hi-C and matching transcriptome data for 28 surgical specimens and Hi-C data for one patient-derived xenograft. The average resolution of the Hi-C maps was 6,833 bp. Using these data, we found that insulation scores of topologically associating domains (TADs) were effective at distinguishing MB molecular subgroups. TAD insulation score differences between subtypes were globally not associated with differential gene expression, although we identified few exceptions near genes expressed in the lineages of origin of specific MB subtypes. Our study therefore supports the notion that TAD insulation scores can distinguish MB subtypes independently of their transcriptional differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.