Trial reportSchizophrenia research2024
Visual remediation of contrast processing impairments in schizophrenia: A preliminary clinical trial.
Trial report in Schizophrenia research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The link between basic visual processing and higher-level social cognition: Eye gaze perception as a bridge in a transdiagnostic sample enriched with social dysfunction.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Altered N170 and compensatory mechanisms in face processing in schizophrenia: an event-related potential study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schizophrenia (SZ) is associated with visual processing impairments, which are related to higher-level functional impairments. This study investigated the impact of a novel visual remediation intervention (VisR) targeting low- and mid-level visual processing impairments in SZ. We hypothesized that VisR would lead to greater improvements in contrast processing when compared to an active control condition and explored potential treatment-related changes in symptom severity. SZ participants (N = 47) were randomized into one of four groups: an active control group (cognitive training; AC); Contrast Sensitivity Training + AC (CST + AC); Contour Integration Training + AC (CIT + AC); and CST + CIT. Participants completed 20-40 training sessions. Clinical symptom severity was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and contrast processing was assessed using steady-state visual evoked potentials to increasing levels of contrast of isolated-check pattern stimuli. A significant Group × Timepoint × Contrast interaction indicated superiority of CST + CIT over AC for improving contrast processing. Furthermore, a large, significant Group × Timepoint interaction indicated that CST + CIT was associated with a greater reduction in positive symptoms compared to AC. In addition, lower severity of positive symptoms at baseline was associated with a greater improvement in contrast processing over the course of treatment. This initial evaluation of VisR demonstrated that it is well tolerated and may produce greater improvements in contrast processing and positive symptoms compared to an intervention targeting only high-level cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.