ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2025
Analysis of 2019 Ohio Disease Intervention Specialist Records for Syphilis Cases Using Clustering Algorithms.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDevelopments in natural language processing and unsupervised machine learning methodologies (e.g., clustering) have given researchers new tools to analyze both structured and unstructured health data. We applied these methods to 2019 Ohio disease intervention specialist (DIS) syphilis records, to determine whether these methods can uncover novel patterns of co-occurrence of individual characteristics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of syphilis that are not yet reported in the literature.
methodsThe 2019 disease intervention specialist syphilis records (n = 1996) contain both structured data (categorical and numerical variables) and unstructured notes. In the structured data, we examined case demographics, syphilis risk factors, and clinical characteristics of syphilis. For the unstructured text, we applied TF-IDF (term frequency multiplied by inverse document frequency) weights, a common way to convert text into numerical representations. We performed agglomerative clustering with cosine similarity using the CLUTO software.
resultsThe cluster analysis yielded 6 clusters of syphilis cases based on patterns in the structured and unstructured data. The average internal similarities were much higher than the average external similarities, indicating that the clusters were well formed. The factors underlying 3 of the clusters related to patterns of missing data. The factors underlying the other 3 clusters were sexual behaviors and partnerships. Notably, 1 of the 3 consisted of individuals who reported oral sex with male or anonymous partners while intoxicated, and one comprised mainly of males who have sex with females.
conclusionsOur analysis resulted in clusters that were well formed mathematically, but did not reveal novel epidemiological information about syphilis risk factors or transmission that were not already known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.