Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39480902›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Limited carry-over effects of socioemotional manipulations on subsequent unrelated memory tasks.

Jaclyn H Ford, Ryan Daley, Julia Maybury, Cortney Stedman, Julia Swiatek, Rachel Van Boxtel, Erin Welch, Elizabeth Kensinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaclyn H FordDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-0974
Ryan DaleyDepartment of Psychology, Gordon College, Wenham, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6779-1658
Julia MayburyDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2189-4416
Cortney StedmanCognitive Neuroscience Program, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Julia SwiatekDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States of America.
Rachel Van BoxtelPacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
Erin WelchDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Elizabeth KensingerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although age is typically associated with significant impairments in memory performance, several domains exist in which these impairments are reduced or even eliminated. These "pockets of preservation" in older adults' memory can be seen in tasks involving socioemotional processing and may be supported by distinct encoding or retrieval modes relative to neutral content. The current study examines whether engaging in socioemotional tasks prior to encoding or retrieval allows older adults to enter an encoding or retrieval mode that better supports memory performance. In two online studies, adults across the lifespan were asked to complete a memory task where they incidentally encoded and retrieved neutral (Experiment 1, N = 1621) or emotional (Experiment 2, N = 409) word-image pairs. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (i.e., no manipulation), pre-encoding, or pre-retrieval socioemotional manipulation condition. There were no main effects of manipulation condition, suggesting that such manipulations may not reliably enhance memory. However, future research is needed to follow up on exploratory analyses that highlighted particular conditions under which these manipulations may convey benefits. There were also no age-by-manipulation interactions. While these null effects may suggest that these manipulations are not better suited to older adults, this may also be a result of the unexpected age-related increases (Experiment 1) and age invariance (Experiment 2) in overall memory accuracy in the current study. Socioemotional manipulations should also be examined in older adults who underperform younger adults.

Indexed as

EmotionsMemoryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39480902
PMCPMC11527296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.