ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Detectability of runs of homozygosity is influenced by analysis parameters and population-specific demographic history.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Whole-Genome Resequencing-Based Selection-Signal and Association Analyses Prioritize Candidate Genes and Haplotypes for PRRS Resistance-Related Traits in Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Comparing the genomic inbreeding of an isolated rhesus macaque study population to wild populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Long-term small effective population size, inbreeding, and a recessive lethal haplotype drive premature death in the endangered Devils Hole pupfish (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evaluating inbreeding and assessing the risk of outbreeding depression in genetic rescue using whole-genome sequence data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Accurate Runs of Homozygosity Estimation From Low Coverage Genome Sequences in Non-Model Species.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Genome-wide assessment of runs of homozygosity and inbreeding in Inner Mongolia cashmere goats reveals candidate genes for economic traits.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Using Historic and Contemporary Genomes to Assess the Genetic Consequences of a Population Decline in an Endangered Tern Population.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- The Donkey Genome: From Evolutionary Insights to Sustainable Breeding Strategies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Beyond Genetic Indicators: How Reproductive Mode and Hybridisation Challenge Freshwater Mussel Conservation.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive genome-wide analysis for signatures of selection in goat (genus Capra) revealed new candidate genes for environmental adaptation and productive traits.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genomic Characterization of the Kazakh Fat-Tailed Coarse-Wool Sheep Breed Using ROH Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Long runs of homozygosity are reliable genomic markers of inbreeding depression.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2025Review
- Kazakh Tobet dogs in the genomic landscape: refining the history of livestock guardian breeds.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Linking Measures of Inbreeding and Genetic Load to Demographic Histories Across Three Species of Bears.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Profiling of runs of homozygosity from whole-genome sequence data in Japanese biobank.Journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Genomic insights and the conservation potential of captive breeding: The case of Chinese alligator.Science advances · 2025Article
- Runs of Homozygosity and Inferences in Wild Populations.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Genome-wide scan for runs of homozygosity in South American Camelids.BMC genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wild populations are increasingly threatened by human-mediated climate change and land use changes. As populations decline, the probability of inbreeding increases, along with the potential for negative effects on individual fitness. Detecting and characterizing runs of homozygosity (ROHs) is a popular strategy for assessing the extent of individual inbreeding present in a population and can also shed light on the genetic mechanisms contributing to inbreeding depression. Here, we analyze simulated and empirical datasets to demonstrate the downstream effects of program selection and long-term demographic history on ROH inference, leading to context-dependent biases in the results. Through a sensitivity analysis we evaluate how various parameter values impact ROH-calling results, highlighting its utility as a tool for parameter exploration. Our results indicate that ROH inferences are sensitive to factors such as sequencing depth and ROH length distribution, with bias direction and magnitude varying with demographic history and the programs used. Estimation biases are particularly pronounced at lower sequencing depths, potentially leading to either underestimation or overestimation of inbreeding. These results are particularly important for the management of endangered species, as underestimating inbreeding signals in the genome can substantially undermine conservation initiatives. We also found that small true ROHs can be incorrectly lumped together and called as longer ROHs, leading to erroneous inference of recent inbreeding. To address these challenges, we suggest using a combination of ROH detection tools and ROH length-specific inferences, along with sensitivity analysis, to generate robust and context-appropriate population inferences regarding inbreeding history. We outline these recommendations for ROH estimation at multiple levels of sequencing effort, which are typical of conservation genomics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.