Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39480792›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Spinal cord stimulation combined with exercise in patients diagnosed with persistent spinal pain syndrome. Study protocol for a randomized control trial.

J Vicente-Mampel, F Falaguera-Vera, D Sánchez-Poveda, F Hernández-Zaballos, M Martinez-Soler, P Blanco-Giménez, F J Sanchez-Montero

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06272539 (Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Exercise in Patients Diagnosed With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome. A Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06272539 nacompletednot on this map

Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Exercise in Patients Diagnosed With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome. A Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente MártirRan2024 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsFailed Back Surgery SyndromeArmsExercise, Spinal Cord Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J Vicente-MampelDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine and Health Science, Catholic University of Valencia, Torrent, Valencia, Spain.
F Falaguera-VeraDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine and Health Science, Catholic University of Valencia, Torrent, Valencia, Spain.
D Sánchez-PovedaSpecialist Physician, Anesthesiology Service, Pain Unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (CAUSA).
F Hernández-ZaballosSpecialist Physician, Anesthesiology Service, Pain Unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (CAUSA).
M Martinez-SolerDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine and Health Science, Catholic University of Valencia, Torrent, Valencia, Spain.
P Blanco-GiménezDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine and Health Science, Catholic University of Valencia, Torrent, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2656-6307
F J Sanchez-MonteroSpecialist Physician, Anesthesiology Service, Pain Unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (CAUSA).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdministration of spinal cord stimulation to individuals with PSPS-T1/2 may induce supraspinal descending activation. Similarly, exercise is recognized as a fundamental aspect of spinal pain management. Studies have demonstrated its impact on neurophysiological factors, including the release of spinal and supraspinal beta-endorphins, which activate μ-opioid receptors. Therefore, the purpose of this study will be to examine the effect of SCS in combination with lumbo-pelvic stability core training on perceived low back pain, quality of life and disability in PSPS-T2 patients. METHODS/MATERIALS: A double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) has been designed. All participants will be randomized from a pre-set sequence. The intervention design has been elaborated from the CONSORT guidelines. This study has been registered at Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT06272539). Sample size was calculated using G Power® Sample size software (University of Düsseldorf). The calculation was based on a moderate effect size of 0.7 (partial η2 = 0.70, α = .05, power = 0.95), resulting in a total of 40 patients. Assuming a 30% dropout rate, 52 participants will be recruited in total. Two sessions per week will be scheduled for 8 weeks with a total of 16 sessions. Each work session will have a duration of 60 minutes. The exercise will be adapted according to the phases based on the results already published, limiting in each phase the degrees of flexion and extension of the spine to avoid the risk of electrode migration. Primary outcomes will be functionality, satisfaction, strength, psychosocial variables, quality of life and pain perception.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyQuality of LifeSpinal Cord StimulationAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39480792
PMCPMC11527166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.