ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
High release of Candida albicans eDNA as protection for the scaffolding of polymicrobial biofilm formed with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans against the enzymatic activity of DNase I.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of fungal pathogenic DNA-activated STING pathway in biofilms and its implication in dental caries onset.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the protective role of the high release of C. albicans extracellular DNA (eDNA) in a polymicrobial biofilm formed by S. aureus and S. mutans in the course of DNase I treatment. A tube-flow biofilm bioreactor was developed to mimic biofilm formation in the oral cavity. eDNA release was quantified by real-time PCR (qPCR) and confocal microscopy analysis were used to determine the concentration and distribution of eDNA and intracellular DNA (iDNA). The mean amount of eDNA released by each species in the polymicrobial was higher than that in monospecies biofilms (S. aureus: 3.1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.