Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39480603›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

A Novel Liver Metastasis Score for Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-institutional Study.

Qi-Xuan Zheng, Jia-Hao Xu, Fa-Ji Yang, Zhi-Peng Liu, Ming-Da Wang, Yi-Jie Hao, Chao Li, Zhe-Yu Niu, Xin-Fei Xu, Heng-Jun Gao and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Qi-Xuan Zheng *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jia-Hao Xu *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fa-Ji Yang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhi-Peng LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Ming-Da WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Jie HaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhe-Yu NiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xin-Fei XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Heng-Jun GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yi-Fan LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Jin-Bo GongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Zhong ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Feng ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jun Lu *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China. lujunsd@126.com.
Tian Yang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. yangtiandfgd@hotmail.com.

Funding

Dawn Project Foundation of Shanghai 21SG36National Natural Science Foundation of China 82241223National Natural Science Foundation of China 82273074National Natural Science Foundation of China 82425049Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality 22ZR1477900Shanghai Health and Hygiene Discipline Leader Project 2022XD001Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leader Program 23XD1424900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver metastasis impacts survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs); however, current guidelines lack consensus on post-resection surveillance and adjuvant therapy. A comprehensive risk stratification tool is needed to guide personalized management.

objectiveWe aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for liver metastasis risk after surgical resection of GEP-NETs that incorporates pathological factors and adjuvant therapy.

methodsPatients with GEP-NETs who underwent surgical resection with curative intent at three major Chinese hospitals (2010-2022) were identified. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis identified independent risk factors of liver metastasis. The liver metastasis score (LMS) was developed using weighted risk factors and validated by tenfold cross-validation.

resultsAmong the 724 patients included in the analytic cohort, liver metastasis occurred in 66 patients (9.1%) at a median of 36 months; patients with liver metastasis had a worse 5-year overall survival (no liver metastasis 63.6% vs. liver metastasis 95.8%; p < 0.001). Independent predictors were Ki-67 index (hazard ratio [HR] 10.36 for Ki-67 3-20%, HR 18.30 for Ki-67 >20%, vs. <3%), vascular invasion (HR 5.03), lymph node metastases (HR 2.24), and lack of adjuvant therapy (HR 3.03). The LMS demonstrated excellent discrimination (C-index 0.888) and stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk relative to 5-year risk of liver metastasis: 2.9%, 20.8%, and 49.7%, respectively (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe novel LMS effectively predicted the risk of liver metastasis after surgical resection of GEP-NETs. This validated model can help guide personalized surveillance and adjuvant treatment strategies, potentially improving outcomes for high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsLiver metastasisPrediction modelSurgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID39480603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.