Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39480547›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Development and validation of an UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of antineoplastic agents and their metabolites in human plasma after unintentional exposure.

Eline Verscheure, Ilana Struys, Matteo Creta, Katrien Poels, Jeroen Vanoirbeek, Liesbeth Lenaerts, Frédéric Amant, Manosij Ghosh, Lode Godderis

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eline Verscheure *Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2322-0941
Ilana Struys *Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Matteo CretaUnit Environmental Hygiene and Human Biological Monitoring, Department of Health Protection, National Health Laboratory (LNS), Rue Louis Rech 1, 3555, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Katrien PoelsCentre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen VanoirbeekCentre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Liesbeth LenaertsDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Frédéric AmantDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Manosij GhoshCentre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Lode GodderisCentre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. lode.godderis@kuleuven.be.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11K6824NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1SD2322N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, epirubicin, doxorubicin and paclitaxel are commonly used drugs in cancer treatment. However, there are no methods available enabling simultaneous measurement of these compounds and their metabolites in human plasma. Our aim was to develop and validate a sensitive method for simultaneous quantification of multiple antineoplastic drugs and their major metabolites in plasma. Solid phase extraction with Oasis PRiME HLB cartridges was used for sample clean-up. The samples were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column, ionised by electrospray ionisation and detected with tandem mass spectrometry. The method was validated based on selectivity, extraction efficiency, matrix effect, process efficiency, linearity, sensitivity, precision and accuracy. The established LLOQs were 0.05 ng/mL (cyclophosphamide), 30 ng/mL (4-oxo-cyclophosphamide), 0.3 ng/mL (doxorubicin, daunorubicinol), 0.7 ng/mL (epirubicin, epirubicinol, doxorubicinol), 1 ng/mL (daunorubicin and paclitaxel) and 5 ng/mL (6-alpha-hydroxypaclitaxel). Afterwards, the method was tested in a real-life, unintentional exposure setting. Twenty-two plasma samples of matched maternal and cord blood pairs from pregnant cancer patients treated with chemotherapy were analysed. This resulted in two positive samples, with cyclophosphamide concentrations up to 0.37 ng/mL. The validated method is now ready to be applied in the field.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleHumansLimit of DetectionReproducibility of ResultsSolid Phase ExtractionAntineoplastic AgentsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinAntineoplastic drugBiomonitoringLiquid chromatography-mass spectrometryMethod validation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.