Observational studyEuropean radiology2025
The GREENWATER study: patients' green sensitivity and potential recovery of injected contrast agents.
Observational study in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Greening computed tomography: a position paper on environmentally responsible imaging practice from the computed tomography subspecialty section of the Italian society of radiology.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Sustainability of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: a review of current evidence.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Effect of distributing urine-collection bags on contrast-material load in wastewater.European radiology · 2026Observational
- Energy performance of MRI systems: on-site validation and comparison with manufacturer declarations.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Dual-energy CT for hypovascular liver metastases: does better image quality translate to clinical benefit?La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Are patients willing to help reduce contrast material in the environment? The outpatient use of urine bags after contrast-enhanced computed tomography.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe environmental footprint of iodinated contrast agents (ICAs) and gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is noteworthy. This study assesses: (1) patients' "green sensitivity" as measured by their acceptance in a sustainability study and (2) the resulting potential reduction of contrast residuals in wastewater. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter ethical approval, participants scheduled for administration of ICAs or GBCAs for diagnostic purposes were enrolled in this prospective observational study from July 2022 to October 2023. They were asked to prolong their hospital stay by up to 60 min to collect their first urine in dedicated canisters, thereby measuring the recovery rates of ICAs and GBCAs as found/theoretical ratio of concentrations. Mann-Whitney U, χ
resultsPatients scheduled for contrast-enhanced CT or MRI (n = 455) were screened; 422 (92.7%) accepted to participate. We enrolled 212 patients administered with ICAs and 210 administered with GBCAs. The median recovery rate was 51.2% (interquartile range 29.2-77.9%) for ICAs and 12.9% (9.0-19.3%) for GBCAs. At multivariable analysis, a significant effect of patient age (ICAs, p = 0.001; GBCAs, p = 0.014), urine volume (p < 0.001 for both), and time interval from contrast administration to urine collection (p < 0.001 for both) on recovery rates was found for both contrast agents; injected contrast volume (p = 0.046) and saline flushing usage (p = 0.008) showed a significant effect only for ICAs.
conclusionThe high patient enrollment compliance (93%) and potential recovery rates of 51% (ICAs) and 13% (GBCAs) play in favor of sustainable practices in reducing the environmental footprint of contrast agents. KEY POINTS: Question How many patients are willing to extend their stay in radiology by up to 60 min to help reduce the environmental impact of contrast agents? Findings Over 90% of screened patients agreed to extend their stay by up to 60 min and collect their urine in dedicated containers. Clinical relevance Patients demonstrated a high willingness to cooperate in reducing the environmental impact of contrast agents, allowing for a potential recovery of approximately 51% for iodinated and 13% for gadolinium-based contrast agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39480535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.