Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39480531›Full record

ReviewMicrobial ecology2024

Paenibacillus as a Biocontrol Agent for Fungal Phytopathogens: Is P. polymyxa the Only One Worth Attention?

Jakub Dobrzyński, Aleksandra Naziębło

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biocontrol of Fungal Pathogens of Winter Oilseed Rape (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complete genome sequences of soil-associatedMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Paenidepsins are a Family of Lipopeptides fromJournal of natural products · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Bioprotective Strategies to ControlInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jakub DobrzyńskiInstitute of Technology and Life Sciences - National Research Institute, Al. Hrabska 3, 05-090, Raszyn, Poland. j.dobrzynski@itp.edu.pl.
Aleksandra NaziębłoInstitute of Technology and Life Sciences - National Research Institute, Al. Hrabska 3, 05-090, Raszyn, Poland. a.nazieblo@itp.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of fungal phytopathogens is a significant challenge in modern agriculture. The widespread use of chemical fungicides to control these pathogens often leads to environmental and food contamination. An eco-friendly alternative that can help reduce reliance on these chemicals is plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), particularly those of the genus Paenibacillus, which appear to be highly effective. The review aims to summarize the existing knowledge on the potential of Paenibacillus spp. as fungal biocontrol agents, identify knowledge gaps, and answer whether other species of the genus Paenibacillus, in addition to Paenibacillus polymyxa, can also be effective biocontrol agents. Paenibacillus spp. can combat plant phytopathogens through various mechanisms, including the production of lipopeptides (such as fusaricidin, paenimyxin, and pelgipeptin), the induction of systemic resistance (ISR), hydrolytic enzymes (chitinase, cellulase, and glucanase), and volatile organic compounds. These properties enable Paenibacillus strains to suppress the growth of fungi such as Fusarium oxysporum, F. solani, Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis cinerea, or Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Notably, several strains of Paenibacillus, including P. polymyxa, P. illinoisensis KJA-424, P. lentimorbus B-30488, and P. elgii JCK1400, have demonstrated efficacy in controlling fungal diseases in plants. Importantly, many formulations with Paenibacillus strains have already been patented, and some are commercially available, but most of them contain only P. polymyxa. Nevertheless, considering the data presented in this review, we believe that other strains from the Paenibacillus genus (besides P. polymyxa) will also be commercialized and used in plant protection in the future. Importantly, there is still limited information regarding their impact on the native microbiota, particularly from the metataxonomic and metagenomic perspectives. Expanding knowledge in this area could enhance the effectiveness of biocontrol agents containing Paenibacillus spp., ensuring safe and sustainable use of biological fungicides.

Indexed as

PaenibacillusPaenibacillus polymyxaPlant DiseasesBiological Control AgentsBotrytisColletotrichumFungiFusariumPest Control, BiologicalRhizoctoniaBiological Control AgentsBiocontrolFungal phytopathogensPaenibacillusPGPB

Identifiers

PMID39480531
PMCPMC11527970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.