Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39480326›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopathology and clinical science2024

Managing clinical heterogeneity in psychopathology: Perspectives from brain research.

Katherine S F Damme, Vijay A Mittal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopathology and clinical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cerebellar Connectivity Addresses Gaps in Cognitive Deficits and Negative Symptoms in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine S F DammeDepartment of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas.ORCID 0000-0003-4260-1528
Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University.

Funding

Prodromal Inventory for Negative Symptoms (PINS): A Development and Validation StudyR01MH116039 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A, STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Motoric features of the voice as indicators of psychomotor agitation and retardation in current and remitted MDDR01MH134369 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MATTHEW A GOLDRICK, VIJAY A MITTAL · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
2/5 CAPER Computerized assessment of psychosis riskR01MH120088 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Estrogen and Mechanisms of Psychotic-like Experiences in the Transition toAdolescenceR21MH136408 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI DAMME, KATHERINE STEFFEN FILIP, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2024 to 2025
$518k
NIMHNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116039NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120088NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH134369NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH136408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical heterogeneity is a significant factor to contend with when seeking to organize, understand, and treat psychopathology. In recent years, the field has prioritized efforts to minimize nonmeaningful heterogeneity and leverage meaningful heterogeneity to improve assessment and diagnostics, inform mechanistic understanding, and facilitate the development of novel treatments. Indeed, exciting developments such as the National Institute for Mental Health Research Domain Criteria and the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology have provided powerful frameworks for facing clinical complexity. While these developments have spurred many advancements, the movement has yet to effectively harness the tremendous potential provided by the brain. Initial work incorporating brain data has focused on validating clinical observations with a biomarker rather than leveraging the brain to provide unique insight into meaningful clinical heterogeneity. To provide future guidance and examples of innovation in the area, we solicited articles from teams seeking to utilize brain research to manage clinical heterogeneity. The search resulted in a diverse illustration of how best to leverage brain data to greater mechanistic understanding and clinical utility. In this introduction, we consider this work and discuss strategies through which brain data can best be used to provide unique insight into clinical heterogeneity. As the science of psychopathology continues to grapple with the promise and costs inherent in utilizing this powerful and complex array of methodologies, it will be important to leverage unique insights from brain science. This special issue provides a useful guide for new and upcoming work and a catalyst for moving the field forward. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

BrainMental DisordersPsychopathologyBiomedical ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID39480326
PMCPMC12050160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.