ArticlemSphere2024
Analytical measuring interval, linearity, and precision of serology assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to CLSI guidelines.
Article in mSphere, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A semi-automated ELISA workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid IgG detection significantly improves throughput and reduces hands-on time.Journal of immunological methods · 2026Article
- Measuring Humoral Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2: A Comprehensive Review of Serological Assays.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Humoral immune responses to the second dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in cancer patients undergoing treatment.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serology testing is commonly used to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines and measure antibodies as a marker of previous infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this study, four laboratory-developed serology enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike and anti-Nucleocapsid immunoglobin G [IgG] and immunoglobin M [IgM]) calibrated to the WHO International Standard 20/136 were validated via analytical measuring interval (limit of blank [LOB], limit of detection [LOD], and limit of quantification [LOQ]), linearity, and precision according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines EP17-A2, EP06 2nd Edition, and EP05-A3. For Spike IgG, LOB was 3.0 binding antibody units per milliliter (BAU/mL), LOD was 4.1 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 27.1 BAU/mL. For Nucleocapsid IgG, LOB was 1.9 BAU/mL, LOD was 3.2 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 24.6 BAU/mL. For Spike IgM, LOB was 57.1 BAU/mL, LOD was 69.0 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 113.5 BAU/mL. For Nucleocapsid IgM, LOD was 242.2 BAU/mL, LOD was 289.9 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 572.4 BAU/mL. Each assay displayed good linearity (max % deviation from linearity (≥LOQ) = 10.7%). The result of within-run repeatability evaluation for medium positive samples was 7.7% for Spike IgG, 4.6% for Nucleocapsid IgG, 7.5% for Spike IgM, and 10.1% for Nucleocapsid IgM. The total precision, including medium positive sample variability across 20 days, three reagent kits, and two operators, was 13.5% for Spike IgG, 14.5% for Nucleocapsid IgG, 17.6% for Spike IgM, and 16.2% for Nucleocapsid IgM. The assays were successfully validated following the applicable CLSI guidelines. All assays met the ±20% deviation from linearity and the ±20% coefficient of variation specification for precision and repeatability. IMPORTANCE: Reliable and validated serology assays are of increasing importance as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus continues to evolve and cause outbreaks. Validation of serology assays along with calibration to the International and National Standards (such as anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin WHO International Standard 20/136 or Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research's National Serology Standard COVID-NS01097) is critical to ensuring that results from clinical studies are reliable and comparable among various assays and laboratories. We describe the design and execution of a comprehensive study that established the analytical measuring intervals, linearity, precision, and repeatability of four in-house developed serology enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike immunoglobin G [IgG] and immunoglobin M [IgM] and anti-Nucleocapsid IgG and IgM) following applicable Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Overall, this study provides practical guidance on experimental design strategies and data analysis techniques, pertaining to the validation of COVID-19 serology assays according to CLSI guidelines, for use in clinical research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.