Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479755›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2024

Measuring loneliness: a head-to-head psychometric comparison of the 3- and 20-item UCLA Loneliness Scales.

Corentin J Gosling, Romain Colle, Ariane Cartigny, Fabrice Jollant, Emmanuelle Corruble, Ariel Frajerman

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07223736 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Postpartum Education Via Artificial Intelligence for Recovery and Loneliness (PEARL): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2026 to 2026Enrolled130ConditionsPelvic Floor Disorder, Loneliness, Postpartum, Mental HealthArmsGenerative artificial intelligence (genAI) postpartum chatbot, Standard of Care (SOC)
NCT07305701 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Mental Health of Medical Students in Orleans: a Cohort Study of a New Faculty

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansRan2025 to 2047Enrolled10,000ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Suicidal Ideation, AlcoholismArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ClassPass Memberships to Improve Well-Being Among Psychiatry Residents: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Corentin J GoslingUniversité Paris Nanterre, Laboratoire DysCo, F-92000 Nanterre, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1133-9344
Romain ColleMOODS Team, INSERM U1018, CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Medicine Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre F-94275, France.
Ariane CartignyUniversité Paris Cité, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Fabrice JollantService Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie de Bicêtre, Mood Center Paris Saclay, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, F-94275, France.
Emmanuelle CorrubleMOODS Team, INSERM U1018, CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Medicine Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre F-94275, France.
Ariel FrajermanMOODS Team, INSERM U1018, CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Medicine Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre F-94275, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the growing interest in the prevalence and consequences of loneliness, the way it is measured still raises a number of questions. In particular, few studies have directly compared the psychometric properties of very short measures of loneliness to standard measures.

methodsWe conducted a large epidemiological study of midwife students (

resultsFirst, as predicted, we found that the two loneliness scales were strongly associated with each other. Second, when using the dimensional scores of the scales, we showed that the internal reliability, convergent-, discriminant-, and known-groups validities were high and of similar magnitude between the UCLA-LS-20 and the UCLA-LS-3. Third, when the scales were dichotomized, the results were more mixed. The sensitivity and/or specificity of the UCLA-LS-3 against the UCLA-LS-20 were systematically below acceptable thresholds, regardless of the dichotomizing process used. In addition, the prevalence of loneliness was strikingly variable as a function of the cut-offs used.

conclusionsOverall, we showed that the UCLA-LS-3 provided an adequate dimensional measure of loneliness that is very similar to the UCLA-LS-20. On the other hand, we were able to highlight more marked differences between the scales when their scores were dichotomized, which has important consequences for studies estimating, for example, the prevalence of loneliness.

Indexed as

lonelinesspsychometric propertiesreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID39479755
PMCPMC11578901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.