ArticleFood science & nutrition2024
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effects of Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. on Key Nodes and Gene Expression in Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway in Collagen-Induced Arthritis Rats.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Dietary Supplementation withMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Positive regulatory role of EuWRKY1 in the biosynthesis of Eucommia ulmoides rubber.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-Targeted Intervention ofMetabolites · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms and preclinical evidence of natural products in diabetic osteoporosis: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- A Review of the Mechanisms, Biological Basis, and Active Ingredients of Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulations in Regulating Organ Function to Alleviate Osteoporosis.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- Traditional medicine in a modern light: a scoping review on the osteoprotective potential ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic osteoporosis (DOP) is a secondary disease that severely affects the health and quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to explore the bone protective effect of aqueous extract of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.