ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024
Three Artificial Liver Models of Treatment of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Coagulation Risk Prediction in Patients With Liver Failure: Integrated Meta-Analysis and Machine Learning Model Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Observational
- Technicalities, current evidence, and clinical indications of hemoadsorption in critically ill children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety analysis of double plasma molecular adsorption system plus plasma exchange for treating acute-on-chronic liver failure.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of serum alpha-fetoprotein kinetics in liver failure on artificial liver support.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Preliminary experience of combined dual plasma molecular adsorption system and plasma exchange in pediatric acute liver failure: a retrospective case series.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based algorithms for the prediction of 90-day survival in patients with liver failure receiving artificial liver therapy.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate clinical efficacy, safety and short-term prognosis of plasma exchange (PE), plasma perfusion combining PE (PP+PE), dual-plasma molecular adsorption system combining PE (DPMAS+PE) in treating acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Methods: Two hundred and fourteen ACLF patients admitted to our hospital were included and divided into PE (n = 72), PP+PE (n = 75), DPMAS+PE group (n = 67). Laboratory indexes and MELD scores were collected, and clinical efficacy was compared. Patients' adverse reactions during and 24-h after treatment were collected, and safety was compared. Survival status of patients was followed-up within 90 days, and prognosis was analyzed. Results: PE, PP+PE and DPMAS+PE significantly reduce TBiL, DBiL, ALT, AST, SA, PT, INR, PCT and CRP levels, and increase PA and PTA levels, compared with pre-treatments ( Conclusion: PE, PP+PE and DPMAS+PE three artificial liver treatment modes can effectively improve liver, kidney and coagulation function of ACLF patients. DPMAS+PE demonstrated better ability to remove endotoxin and inflammatory mediators, showed advantages in reducing ACLF patient mortality within 90 days, and had the least impact on electrolyte post-treatment. Therefore, DPMAS+PE can be used as a better choice for clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.