Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479430›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons

Advancing Precision in Penile Length Measurement: Evidence-based Synthesis of Stretched Penile Length INdicator Technique (SPLINT).

Prabudh Goel, Prativa Choudhury, Komal Kaur Saroya, Vishesh Jain, Anjan Kumar Dhua, Devendra Kumar Yadav, Sachit Anand, Sandeep Agarwala, Kanika Sharma, Vikesh Agrawal and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Epigenetic Signatures in Hypospadias: Systematic Review.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Reference Standards for Stretched Penile Length in Indian Boys.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Micropenis in Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Prabudh GoelDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Prativa ChoudhuryDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Komal Kaur SaroyaDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vishesh JainDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anjan Kumar DhuaDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Devendra Kumar YadavDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sachit AnandDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sandeep AgarwalaDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kanika SharmaDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vikesh AgrawalDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Government Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Subhasis SahaSenior Consultant Pediatric Surgeon, AMRI Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Harpreet SinghDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Naveen SharmaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
V P SinghDepartment of Health Research, DHR-ICMR Coordinating Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to synthesize evidence and propose a technique for estimation of stretched penile length (SPL) applicable to children. Materials and Methods: This review has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were queried on penile length (PL) measurement techniques in humans published from 1990 onward. The devices and the techniques used for PL measurement, state of the penis, the habitus of the participants, proximal and distal landmarks for measurement, handling the foreskin and pubic pad of fat, optimal stretching of the penis, and other factors (including the environment) which should be accounted for in the technique were identified from the study cohort (90895 participants across 145 included studies). Results: PL has been represented through flaccid (33.79%), stretched (81.3%), and erect (12.41%) PLs as well as the greatest corporeal length (1.4%). Following devices have been used to measure the PL in the study cohort: rulers [54.68%], calipers [9.7%], measuring tapes [14.5%], coloured measuring strips [2.06%], spatulas/tongue depressors [11.03%], FitKit, syringe [1.4%], cotton swab (and ruler), titan cylinders, slide gauge and ultrasonography [1.37%]. The factors relevant to SPL measurement have been incorporated into the proposed SPL INdicator Technique (SPLINT) which is essentially a holistic extension of the " Conclusions: There is a wide range of heterogeneity in the technique for estimation of PL across the study cohort; the underlying factors have been identified along with the respective variables, and the SPLINT for SPL has been described.

Indexed as

Erect penile lengthmeasurementpenile lengthstretched penile lengthStretched Penile Length INdicator Technique

Identifiers

PMID39479430
PMCPMC11521232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.