ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Neonates: A Meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic surgery is an increasingly popular surgical technique for the repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety of thoracoscopic surgery and the conventional open surgical approach for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Google, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies comparing thoracoscopic surgery and open surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A total of 6 studies with 3348 patients were found. Parameters such as operation time, hospital stay, recurrence rate, postoperative mortality, and postoperative complications were pooled and compared by meta-analysis. Results: Of the 3348 children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia included in the 6 studies, 615 underwent thoracoscopic surgery and 2733 underwent open surgery. All studies were nonrandomized controlled trials. The operation times were shorter for thoracoscopic surgery than for open surgery in three studies, but there was no significant difference (standard mean difference = 1.25, confidence interval [CI] = [-0.48-2.98], Conclusion: Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, fewer complications, and less postoperative mortality than traditional open repair. However, the rate of recurrence was found to be higher in those who underwent thoracoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.