ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Clinical Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Sepsis Patients with Early Antibiotic Treatment.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in blood culture-negative endocarditis: a structured review with illustrative pooled estimates.Infection · 2026Review
- Case Report: Sequential mNGS captures fatal HSV-1 reactivation after intestinal obstruction-associated ARDS in a 91-year-old.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Sequencing Technologies for Detecting Antimicrobial Resistance in Bloodstream Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cell-free DNA in sepsis: from molecular insights to clinical management.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Comparison of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology with routine laboratory culture for bacterial and fungal detection in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) guides targeted antibiotic therapy and reduces mortality in sepsis: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Future of Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis: The Transformative Role of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Culture-Negative Cases.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Review
- Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Infectious Diseases: Clinical Applications, Translational Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A comprehensive evaluation of plasma metagenomics sequencing for the diagnosis of suspected infection in pediatric patients with hematologic diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Liver abscess and septic shock due toFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in sepsis patients who received early empirical antibiotic treatment. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from sepsis patients diagnosed in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) between April 2019 and May 2023. All patients underwent standard conventional microbiological testing. Patients were categorized into either the mNGS group or the control group based on whether they underwent mNGS tests. Baseline variables were matched using propensity scores. Results: Out of 461 sepsis patients screened, 130 were included after propensity matching, with 65 patients in each group. Despite prior antibiotic treatment, 57 cases (87.69%) in the mNGS group had positive mNGS results, exceeding the culture detection rate (52.31%). Besides, a higher proportion of patients in the mNGS group experienced antibiotic adjustments compared to the control group (72.31% vs 53.85%). Mortality rates were also compared based on the duration of antibiotic exposure before mNGS sampling. Patients exposed to antibiotics for less than 24 hours had a lower mortality rate compared to those exposed for over 8 days (22.22% vs 42.86%). COX multivariate analysis identified mNGS testing, underlying diseases, lymphocyte percentage, infection site (respiratory and bloodstream) as independent risk factors for mortality in sepsis patients. Conclusion: With increased antibiotic exposure time, the positive rate of culture testing significantly decreased (44.44% vs 59.52% vs 35.71%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.