ArticleJapanese journal of comprehensive rehabilitation science2024
Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on knee joint extensor strength in older persons receiving day services.
Article in Japanese journal of comprehensive rehabilitation science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kamiue M, Tsubahara A, Ito T, Koike Y. Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on knee joint extensor strength in older persons receiving day services. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci 2024; 15: 49-57. Objective: To verify the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on knee joint extensor strength and motor ability in older adults receiving day services. Methods: Thirty Hz rPMS using Talent Pro Results: MVC significantly increased in both lower limbs after the intervention (right/left: 72.4 ± 23.5 Nm/72.9 ± 23.0 Nm) compared with immediately before the intervention (right/left: 59.9 ± 17.2 Nm/64.5 ± 21.0 Nm). No significant changes were observed in MVC between one month before the intervention and immediately before the start of the intervention, and between the end of the intervention and one month after the end of the intervention. rPMS-induced torque, TUG, and CS-30 improved significantly after the intervention compared with immediately before the intervention. Conclusion: Intervention using rPMS increases MVC- and rPMS-induced torque and improves motor ability in older adults. Because rPMS is a simple means of increasing muscle strength, it is expected to be widely used in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.