Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479329›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2024

Preventing Cardiac Damage in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer and Lymphoma: The PROACT Clinical Trial.

David Austin, Rebecca H Maier, Nasima Akhter, Mohammad Sayari, Emmanuel Ogundimu, Jamie M Maddox, Sharareh Vahabi, Alison C Humphreys, Janine Graham, Helen Oxenham and 23 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03265574 (Preventing Cardiac Damage in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer and Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03265574 phase3completednot on this map

Preventing Cardiac Damage in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer and Lymphoma: a Phase 3 Randomised, Open Label, Blinded Endpoint, Superiority Trial of Enalapril to Prevent Anthracycline-induced CardioToxicity

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2017 to 2023Enrolled111ConditionsBreast Cancer, Non Hodgkin LymphomaArmsEnalapril
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Risk-guided cardioprotection in cardio-oncology.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Understanding the distinct role of PI3K(p110Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

David AustinAcademic Cardiovascular Unit, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Rebecca H MaierAcademic Cardiovascular Unit, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Nasima AkhterSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Mohammad SayariDepartment of Mathematical Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Emmanuel OgundimuDepartment of Mathematical Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Jamie M MaddoxDepartment of Haematology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Sharareh VahabiBristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alison C HumphreysCancer Services, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Janine GrahamCancer Services, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Helen OxenhamDepartment of Cardiology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom.
Sophie HaneyCancer Services, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Nicola CrestiFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Mark VerrillFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Wendy OsborneFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Kathryn L WrightFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Rebecca GoranovaDepartment of Oncology, Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
James R BaileyDepartment of Haematology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, United Kingdom.
Nagesh KalakondaDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mac MachetaDepartment of Haematology, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals, Blackpool, United Kingdom.
Mari F KilnerPathology Services, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, United Kingdom.
Moya E YoungDepartment of Haematology, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Nick J MorleyDepartment of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Pratap NeelakantanDepartment of Haematology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, United Kingdom.
Georgia GilbertAcademic Cardiovascular Unit, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Byju K ThomasAcademic Cardiovascular Unit, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Richard J GrahamAcademic Cardiovascular Unit, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Takeshi FujisawaCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nicholas L MillsCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Victoria HildrethNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jonathan PrichardNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Adetayo S KasimDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Helen C HancockNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Chris PlummerDepartment of Cardiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/F/21/90010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiotoxicity is a concern for cancer survivors undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy. Enalapril has been explored for its potential to mitigate cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. The dose-dependent cardiotoxicity effects of anthracyclines can be detected early through the biomarker cardiac troponin. Objectives: The PROACT (Preventing Cardiac Damage in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer and Lymphoma) clinical trial assessed the effectiveness of enalapril in preventing cardiotoxicity, manifesting as myocardial injury and cardiac function impairment, in patients undergoing high-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy for breast cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial employed a superiority design with observer-blinded endpoints. A total of 111 participants, scheduled for 6 cycles of chemotherapy with a planned dose of ≥300 mg/m Results: Myocardial injury, indicated by cardiac troponin T (≥14 ng/L), during and 1 month after chemotherapy, was observed in 42 (77.8%) of 54 patients in the enalapril group vs 45 (83.3%) of 54 patients in the standard care group (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.23-1.78). Injury detected by cardiac troponin I (>26.2 ng/L) occurred in 25 (47.2%) of 53 patients on enalapril compared with 24 (45.3%) of 53 in standard care (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.50-2.38). A relative decline of more than 15% from baseline in left ventricular global longitudinal strain was observed in 10 (21.3%) of 47 patients on enalapril and 9 (21.9%) of 41 in standard care (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.33-2.74). An absolute decline of >10% to <50% in left ventricular ejection fraction was seen in 2 (4.1%) of 49 patients on enalapril vs none in patients in standard care. Conclusions: Adding enalapril to standard care during chemotherapy did not prevent cardiotoxicity in patients receiving high-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy. (PROACT: Can we prevent Chemotherapy-related Heart Damage in Patients With Breast Cancer and Lymphoma?; NCT03265574).

Indexed as

anthracyclinebiomarkersbreast cancerechocardiographylymphomaprevention

Identifiers

PMID39479329
PMCPMC11520224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.