ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2024
Prognosis After Withdrawal of Cardioprotective Therapy in Patients With Improved Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.
Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Quest for a Safer Use of Anthracyclines Continues: Risk Prediction of Clinical Cardiotoxicity.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation and management of recent onset cardiomyopathy in the current era of heart failure therapeutics: a clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Cardio-oncology, from Guidelines to Practice: Filling the Gap - an Eastern European Viewpoint.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity: Bridging the gap between evidence and practice.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- De-escalating Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- The year in cardiovascular medicine 2024: the top 10 papers in cardio-oncology.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Reply: Withdrawal of Cardioprotective Therapy Following Improvement in Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Withdrawal of Cardioprotective Therapy in Patients With Recovered Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Navigating the Uncharted: Rethinking Cardioprotective Therapy Discontinuation in Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Guiding Treatment With Recovered CTRCD: Time to Focus on Definitions of Recovery and Randomized Data.JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The long-term prognosis after the discontinuation of cardioprotective therapy (CPT) in patients with cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) that has shown improvement remains unclear. Objectives: This study aims to assess the prognosis after CPT withdrawal in patients exhibiting improved CTRCD. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of a single-center prospective cohort study, patients with improved CTRCD, defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥10 percentage points from the time of CTRCD diagnosis, were included. We analyzed their clinical outcomes, which included hospitalization for heart failure or a decrease in LVEF ≥10 percentage points within 2 years after CTRCD improvement, alongside echocardiographic changes. Results: The cohort comprised 134 patients with improved CTRCD. The median follow-up duration after CTRCD diagnosis was 368.3 days (Q1-Q3: 160-536 days). After improvement, 90 patients continued CPT (continued group [CG]) and 44 withdrew CPT (withdrawn group [WG]). Among patients whose baseline LVEF at CTRCD diagnosis ranged from 45% to 55%, the final mean LVEF was comparable between both groups (CG: 64.9% ± 4.4% vs WG: 62.9% ± 4.2%; Conclusions: Patients who withdrew CPT after demonstrating improvement in CTRCD experienced worse clinical outcomes. Notably, a significant decrease in LVEF was observed after CPT withdrawal in patients with a baseline LVEF <45%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.