ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
Modeling and characterization of pure and odorant mixture processing in the
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elements of olfactory intelligence in Drosophila.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Associative memory in the Mushroom Body of the fruit fly brain depends on the encoding and processing of odorants in the first three stages of the Early Olfactory System: the Antenna, the Antennal Lobe and the Mushroom Body Calyx. The Kenyon Cells (KCs) of the Calyx provide the Mushroom Body compartments the identity of pure and odorant mixtures encoded as a train of spikes. Characterizing the code underlying the KC spike trains is a major challenge in neuroscience. To address this challenge we start by explicitly modeling the space of odorants using constructs of both semantic and syntactic information. Odorant semantics concerns the identity of odorants while odorant syntactics pertains to their concentration amplitude. These odorant attributes are multiplicatively coupled in the process of olfactory transduction. A key question that early olfactory systems must address is how to disentangle the odorant semantic information from the odorant syntactic information. To address the untanglement we devised an Odorant Encoding Machine (OEM) modeling the first three stages of early olfactory processing in the fruit fly brain. Each processing stage is modeled by Divisive Normalization Processors (DNPs). DNPs are spatio-temporal models of canonical computation of brain circuits. The end-to-end OEM is constructed as cascaded DNPs. By extensively modeling and characterizing the processing of pure and odorant mixtures in the Calyx, we seek to answer the question of its functional significance. We demonstrate that the DNP circuits in the OEM combinedly reduce the variability of the Calyx response to odorant concentration, thereby separating odorant semantic information from syntactic information. We then advance a code, called first spike sequence code, that the KCs make available at the output of the Calyx. We show that the semantics of odorants can be represented by this code in the spike domain and is ready for easy memory access in the Mushroom Body compartments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.