Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479297›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

CRISPR-Cas systems and applications for crop bioengineering.

Mireia Uranga, Ana Montserrat Martín-Hernández, Nico De Storme, Fabio Pasin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mireia UrangaLaboratory for Plant Genetics and Crop Improvement, Division of Crop Biotechnics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ana Montserrat Martín-HernándezCentre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), Barcelona, Spain.
Nico De StormeLaboratory for Plant Genetics and Crop Improvement, Division of Crop Biotechnics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Fabio PasinInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universitat Politècnica de València (CSIC-UPV), Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas technologies contribute to enhancing our understanding of plant gene functions, and to the precise breeding of crop traits. Here, we review the latest progress in plant genome editing, focusing on emerging CRISPR-Cas systems, DNA-free delivery methods, and advanced editing approaches. By illustrating CRISPR-Cas applications for improving crop performance and food quality, we highlight the potential of genome-edited crops to contribute to sustainable agriculture and food security.

Indexed as

Cas9 (CRISPR associated protein 9)-mediated genome editingCRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)crop trait improvementgenome engineeringprecise breedingtransgene-free genome editing

Identifiers

PMID39479297
PMCPMC11521923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.